English
Reconciliation and Final Value Opinion
Chapter 11: Reconciliation and Final Value Opinion
I. Introduction: Scientific Basis of Reconciliation
Reconciliation is a critical step in the Sales Comparison Approach, integrating statistical analysis, inferential reasoning, and expert judgment. It moves beyond simple averagingโ to provide a scientifically defensible value conclusion.
- Core Concept: Weighing and synthesizing multiple value indicators (derived from comparable sales) to arrive at a single, supportable value opinion for the subject property.
II. Principles and Theories
A. Statistical Reliability and Sample Size
1. The **Central Limit Theorem** states that the distribution of sample means will approach a normal distribution as the sample size increases, regardless of the underlying population distribution.
2. Applied to appraisal:
* A larger pool of comparable sales increases the reliability of the reconciled value.
* The **Standard Error of the Mean** decreases as sample size increases. ( *SE = SD / โn*, where *SE* is the standard error, *SD* is the standard deviation, and *n* is the sample size).
3. **Practical Application**: When possible, utilize more than three comparable sales to increase statistical robustness.
B. Adjustment Theory and Regression Analysis
1. Adjustments account for quantifiable differences between comparable properties and the subject property.
2. **Multiple Regression Analysis**: A statistical technique used to model the relationship between a dependent variable (property value) and several independent variables (property characteristics).
* Equation: *Value = ฮฒโ + ฮฒโXโ + ฮฒโXโ + โฆ + ฮฒโXโ + ฮต*, where *ฮฒ* represents the regression coefficients, *X* represents the independent variables, and *ฮต* represents the error term.
3. **Practical Application**: Regression analysis can quantify the impact of individual property characteristics on value, providing a basis for adjustments.
C. Principle of Substitution and Market Equilibrium
1. The Principle of Substitution dictates that a buyer will pay no more for a property than the cost of acquiring an equally desirable substitute.
2. Market equilibrium: The price at which supply equals demand.
3. Applied to reconciliation: Give more weight to comparables that most closely represent market equilibrium conditions.
D. Expert Judgment and Bayesian Inference
1. Reconciliation requires expert judgment based on experience, market knowledge, and inferential reasoning.
2. **Bayesian Inference**: Updating beliefs (value opinion) based on new evidence (comparable sales data).
* Equation: *P(A|B) = [P(B|A) * P(A)] / P(B)*, where *P(A|B)* is the probability of event A (true value) given event B (comparable sale data).
3. **Practical Application**: Weigh the relevance of each comparable based on its similarities to the subject property and overall market trends.
III. Reconciliation Process: A Detailed Examination
A. Data Review and Validation
1. Scrutinize all data for errors, inconsistencies, and outliers.
2. Statistical tests (e.g., Grubbs' test) can identify outliers.
* Formula: *G = (Xแตข - Xฬ) / SD*, where *G* is the Grubbs' test statistic, *Xแตข* is the suspect value, *Xฬ* is the sample mean, and *SD* is the standard deviation.
3. **Practical Experiment**: Create a dataset of comparable sales and introduce an artificial outlier. Use statistical tests to identify the outlier and assess its impact on the reconciled value.
B. Reliability Assessment
1. Evaluate the reliability of each value indicator based on:
* Data quality.
* Adjustment accuracy.
* Market relevance.
2. **Weighted Average**: Assign weights to each value indicator based on its reliability.
* Formula: *Reconciled Value = ฮฃ(Weightแตข * Value Indicatorแตข)*, where *Weightแตข* represents the weight assigned to each comparable.
3. **Practical Application**: Develop a scoring system to quantify the reliability of each value indicator.
C. Weighting Criteria
1. Adjust for Sales or Financing Concessions: The Appraiser is expected to acquire a copy of the contract of sale and to analyze the contents of the contract.
2. Adjust Date of Sale/Time: Shown only for the comparables. In most cases only the month and year of the sale are reported.
3. Make adjustment for location, leasehold/fee simple, Quality of Construction, Age, Site, View, and Functional Utility.
D. Final Value Opinion
1. Based on the weighted average and considering all available evidence.
2. Clearly justify the final value opinion in the appraisal report.
3. Sensitivity analysis: Assess how changes in key assumptions would affect the final value opinion.
IV. Final Value Opinion and Report
A. The Point Estimate
1. The final reconciled value is presented as a single dollar amount.
2. Justification: Provides a clear and concise estimate of value, essential for decision-making.
B. The Range Value
1. An alternative to the point estimate.
2. Reflects the uncertainty inherent in the appraisal process.
3. Justification: Acknowledges the limitations of available data and the potential for market fluctuations.
C. Rounding
1. Round the final value opinion to a reasonable level of precision.
2. Indicates the value is an estimate.
D. Clear Reporting
1. The appraisal report must be understandable to a non-appraiser reader.
PDF File Content Summaries:
- Appraiser Responsibilities: The appraiser must ensure work is understandable and defends their reasoning, considering review appraisers may discredit the conclusions.
- Reconciliation and Value: Reconciliation analyzes value indicators to reach a single opinion. Judgment and experience are essential; averaging is not used. Reviewing data, calculations, and reasoning are the start of reconciliation.
- Reliability Factors: Reliability relies on the data quantity, accuracy, and relevance to the appraisal problem.
- Evidence and Judgment: Reconciliation relies on judgment to reconcile value indicators by assessing reliability; more data, more verification, and relevance strengthen a value.
- Appraisal Report Completion: The reconciliation section in the appraisal report notes whether the appraisal is “as is” or conditional and includes the appraisal approaches. The report concludes with the appraiser’s signature, license number, and reaffirmation of the appraisal’s purpose.
- Value Expressions: Final opinions are stated as “Point Estimate” or “Range Value,” with rounding for clarity.
- Understandable Report: The report should be accessible to non-appraisers.
Chapter Summary
Scientific Summary: Reconciliation and Final value opinionโ
This chapter on “Reconciliation and final value opinionโ” within a property valuation training course, focuses on the critical step in the salesโ comparison approach where multipleโ value indicators are synthesized into a single, supportable opinion of value. The core scientific principles revolve around data reliability, accuracy, and relevance, emphasizing that valuation is not a simple mathematical averaging process.
Main Scientific Points:
- Reconciliation as a Judgment-Based Process: The chapter explicitly rejects the use of mathematical formulas or averaging techniques. Instead, it emphasizes that reconciliation relies heavily on the appraiser’s informed judgment and experience. This judgment is grounded in a thorough review of data, calculations, and reasoning that underpin each value indicator.
- Data Reliability, Accuracy, and Relevance: The chapter outlines a hierarchical framework for assessing the quality of value indicators:
- Amount of Data: Indicators based on larger statistical samples, detailed data, or multiple independent sources are considered more reliable.
- Accuracy of Data and Technique: Accuracy depends on data verification and the appropriateness of the appraisal technique used. Verified data and relevant techniques contribute to a more accurate value indicator.
- Relevance to the Appraisal Problem: Indicators must be consistent with the appraisal assignment’s terms and employ appropriate appraisal techniques for the specific property type and purpose.
- Evidence-Based Justification: The final reconciled valueโ must be supported by evidence presented within the appraisal report. The appraiser’s reasoning for selecting a particular value and the weighting given to different indicators must be clearly articulated.
- Final Value Opinion Format: The chapter clarifies that the final value opinion is typically expressed as a “point estimate” (a single dollar amount). It acknowledges the less common alternative of a “range value” and reinforces the need for appropriate rounding.
- Critical Self-Review: Appraisers are urged to review their work critically, ensuring clarity and understandability for readers who may not be appraisal experts, and in readiness for any potential review of their work.
Conclusions:
The reconciliation process is a critical point of synthesis in property valuation, demanding more than mere calculation. A credible value conclusion stems from critically examining value indicators, emphasizing the significance of data quantity, quality, relevance, and the sound application of appraisal techniques.
Implications:
- Reduced Valuation Errors: By explicitly focusing on data qualityโ and critical judgment, the chapter aims to mitigate valuation errors arising from over-reliance on simple averaging or flawed data.
- Improved Transparency and Defensibility: The emphasis on documenting the appraiser’s reasoning and supporting evidence enhances the transparency and defensibility of the final value opinion, making it less susceptible to challenge during review.
- Enhanced Professionalism: Reinforcing that appraisal is a judgment-based profession grounded in sound, reliable data should enhance appraisal professionalism.
- Mitigation of Review Challenges: A well-reconciled appraisal, as defined in the chapter, is more likely to withstand critical review, protecting the appraiser’s reputation.
