Site Valuation Methods: Cost & Sales Comparison

Site Valuation Methods: Cost & Sales Comparison
Chapter Description: Unlock the secrets of valuation! This course delves into the core principles of appraisal, clarifying the economic concept of “value.” Learn how value is an opinion, not a fact, and how it is always qualified by specific definitions, such as market value, liquidation value, or investment value. Master the crucial distinctions and gain a solid foundation for confident and informed appraisal practices.
I. Introduction
Site valuation is a critical component of the appraisal process, particularly when employing the cost approach to value or certain income capitalization techniques. This chapter focuses on two primary methods for site valuation: the Cost Approach and the Sales Comparison Approach. Understanding these methods is essential for arriving at a credible and well-supported opinion of value, as site value is a key input for many appraisal techniques. This understanding is deeply related to the course description, as it is fundamental to the appraisal principles and the clarification of how appraisal leads to an opinion of value (not a factual value). It also reinforces the idea that understanding the methods involved is a step towards confident and informed appraisal practices.
II. Importance of Site Valuation
A. Data for Valuation Techniques: As indicated in the book content, a separate site valuation is necessary when employing the cost approach and, potentially, the land residual technique within income capitalization.
B. Legal and Regulatory Requirements: In many jurisdictions, particularly in appraisals for property tax assessment and condemnation proceedings, a separate site valuation is mandated by law. This is due to the need to fairly allocate value between land and improvements for taxation or compensation purposes. As mentioned in the book content, the scope of the assignment itself can also mandate this separation.
C. Highest and Best Use Analysis: Site valuation is intertwined with highest and best use analysis. The value of the site is directly linked to its most productive and profitable use, as it contributes more to the property value when utilized in its best use.
III. Sales Comparison Approach for Site Valuation
The sales comparison approach, also known as the market data approach, is widely considered the most reliable method for site valuation when sufficient data is available. As reinforced in the book content, this approach relies on analyzing recent sales of comparable sites to derive an indicated value for the subject site.
A. Theoretical Basis: The sales comparison approach is rooted in the economic principle of substitution. This principle states that a rational buyer will pay no more for a property than the cost of acquiring an equally desirable substitute. In the context of site valuation, the substitute is a comparable site that has recently sold.
B. Steps in the Sales Comparison Approach:
- Identify Comparable Sites: The first step is to identify several recently sold vacant sites that are similar to the subject site. These sites should ideally be in the same or similar neighborhood and have comparable zoning, size, and physical characteristics.
- Gather Data on Comparable Sales: Collect detailed information on each comparable sale, including the sale price, date of sale, terms of sale, and any other relevant factors. This data should be verified through reliable sources, such as public records or real estate professionals.
- Identify Elements of Comparison: Determine the key characteristics that influence site value in the market. These elements, as listed in the book content, include:
* Real Property Rights Conveyed: Differences in property rights (e.g., fee simple vs. leasehold) can significantly impact value.
* Financing Terms: Favorable or unfavorable financing terms can influence the sale price. It’s vital to understand the present value concept here as it is key to appraisal practices and course description’s scope. Use this formula for present value:
PV = FV / (1 + r)^n
* Where PV is the Present Value, FV is the Future Value, r is the interest rate, and n is the number of compounding periods.
* Conditions of Sale: Unusual conditions, such as forced sales or sales between related parties, can distort the sale price.
* Expenditures Immediately After Sale: Any costs the buyer must incur immediately after the sale, such as demolition expenses, affect what a prudent buyer would be willing to pay for the site.
* Market Conditions Adjustment: Changes in market conditions (e.g., rising or falling prices) between the date of sale of the comparable and the effective date of the appraisal must be considered. If the value is increasing/decreasing linearly, we use:
Adjusted Sale Price = Sale Price * (1 + (r * t))
* Where ‘r’ is rate of change, and ‘t’ is the amount of time.
* Location Adjustments: Differences in location, such as neighborhood amenities or proximity to desirable features, can affect value.
* Physical Characteristics: Differences in size, shape, topography, soil conditions, and other physical attributes can impact value. These aspects relate directly to the understanding of value in the area and how the land adds to the entire property value.
* Economic Characteristics: Economic factors like property taxes, zoning regulations, and the availability of utilities also contribute to the value. - Make Adjustments to Comparable Sales Prices: Adjust the sale prices of the comparable sites to account for any differences between them and the subject site. The goal is to estimate what each comparable would have sold for if it were identical to the subject site. Adjustments can be made on a dollar or percentage basis.
Note:
Use dollar adjustments when dealing with differences in quantifiable features like lot size.
Use percentage adjustments❓❓ when dealing with subjective features like location or view. - Reconcile the Adjusted Sales Prices: Analyze the adjusted sales prices of the comparable sites and reconcile them into a single indicated value for the subject site. This reconciliation process involves considering the reliability of each comparable and the magnitude of the adjustments made. It’s related to the process of reconciliation, also found in the book’s content.
C. Practical Applications and Related Experiments:
- Practical Example: An appraiser is valuing a 1-acre vacant site in a suburban area zoned for single-family residential development. They identify three comparable sales:
* Comparable 1: Sold for $100,000 one year ago, located in a slightly less desirable neighborhood.
* Comparable 2: Sold for $110,000 six months ago, same neighborhood, but slightly smaller lot size (0.9 acres).
* Comparable 3: Sold for $95,000 two years ago, same neighborhood, but had slightly less favorable topography. - Experiment:
1. The appraiser collects market data to quantify the impact of neighborhood desirability, lot size, and topography on site values.
2. They determine that:
* Neighborhood desirability accounts for a 5% increase in sales price.
* Lot size accounts for a $10,000 difference per acre.
* Topography differences account for a 2% increase.
* Market conditions have increased 3% per year.
3. Applying the market data:
* Comparable 1: adjusted by +5% (location) and +3% (market), yielding $108,150.
* Comparable 2: adjusted by -$10,000 (lot size) +1.5% (market conditions), yielding $101,665.
* Comparable 3: adjusted by +2% (topography) +6% (market conditions), yielding $103,660.
4. The appraiser reconciles these adjusted prices and arrives at a final value indication of $104,500 for the subject site. This number is an opinion, not a fact, related to the course description. - Scientific Explanation: This process leverages statistical methods to minimize the influence of irrelevant variations between sites, such as through calculating weighted averages.
IV. Cost Approach for Site Valuation
The cost approach assumes that the value of an improved property is indicated by the value of the site, plus the cost to construct new improvements, less depreciation, as mentioned in the book content. To use this approach, the land value must first be determined as if vacant.
A. Theoretical Basis: The cost approach is grounded in the principle of substitution. It assumes that a rational buyer will not pay more for an existing property than the cost of acquiring a comparable site and constructing a similar building.
B. Steps in the Cost Approach:
- Estimate the Site Value: This is the most critical step, as it directly impacts the accuracy of the final value indication. The sales comparison approach should be used to estimate the site value, as detailed above. The value is an opinion, and it is qualified (market value, etc).
- Estimate the replacement cost❓ New (RCN) of the Improvements: Determine the current cost to construct a replica of the existing improvements, using current materials and construction standards. Cost data can be obtained from various sources, such as cost manuals, builders, or contractors. As the book content indicates, the replacement cost is estimated as of the date of valuation.
- Estimate Accrued Depreciation: Calculate the amount of depreciation that the improvements have suffered due to physical deterioration, functional obsolescence, and external obsolescence. As noted in the book content, estimating accrued depreciation is often the most difficult part of applying the cost approach.
- Depreciation can be classified into 3 types:
- Physical Deterioration: Wear and tear on the building.
- Functional Obsolescence: Loss of value due to outdated design or features.
- External Obsolescence: Loss of value due to factors outside the property, such as neighborhood decline.
- Depreciation estimation methods:
- Age life method: Estimates depreciation by the ratio of the effective age and the total economic life:
Depreciation = Replacement Cost New * (Effective Age / Total Economic Life)
- Age life method: Estimates depreciation by the ratio of the effective age and the total economic life:
- Depreciation can be classified into 3 types:
-
Calculate the Indicated Value: Subtract the accrued depreciation from the RCN of the improvements and add the site value to arrive at the indicated value of the property.
Indicated Value = Site Value + RCN - Depreciation
C. Practical Applications and Related Experiments:
- Practical Example:
* Site Value (using sales comparison): $100,000
* RCN of Improvements: $300,000
* Accrued Depreciation (using age-life method and an effective age of 20 years, economic life of 60): $100,000
* Indicated Value = $100,000 + $300,000 - $100,000 = $300,000 - Experiment:
1. An appraiser wants to test the impact of inaccurate depreciation estimates on the cost approach.
2. They prepare two cost approach analyses for the same property, one with a “high” depreciation estimate and one with a “low” depreciation estimate.
3. They compare the resulting value indications to the sales price of comparable properties to determine which depreciation estimate is more accurate. - Scientific Explanation: The accuracy of the cost approach relies heavily on accurate cost data and depreciation estimates. Errors in these areas can significantly impact the reliability of the final value indication.
V. Reconciliation
As the book content points out, in Step 7, reconciling the value indicators requires analyzing the problem, selecting the most appropriate method, and giving it the most weight.
The appraiser must reconcile the value indications derived from the sales comparison and cost approaches into a final opinion of value. This reconciliation process involves considering the strengths and weaknesses of each approach and giving the most weight to the one that is most reliable and applicable to the specific appraisal assignment. In cases where separate site valuations are necessary, reconciling differences between the site values derived through the Sales Comparison and Extraction methods will be a common task, focusing on the data quality and adjustment rationales behind each approach.
VI. Conclusion
Understanding site valuation methods is essential for appraisers. Both the Sales Comparison and Cost Approaches offer valuable tools for estimating land value, a critical input for various valuation techniques. By mastering these methods, and constantly refining professional judgment as suggested by USPAP requirements, appraisers can develop credible and well-supported opinions of value that inform real estate decisions. This process reinforces the idea from the course description, as it is a fundamental clarification of how appraisal leads to an opinion of value (not a factual value), which is further qualified by specific definitions. Also, through practicing and understanding these methods, appraisers can ensure they are developing a confident and informed appraisal practice, contributing to the integrity and reliability of the real estate market.
Chapter Summary
- list the three basic activity zones of a house and describe their relationships to each other;
- describe the characteristics that affect functional utility in the various rooms of a
house, - identify the characteristics of various building components that can affect value❓, and
- understand the technical terminology used to describe residential construction.
I. Classification of Houses
Houses are generally classified on the basis of four characteristics: the number of units, whether the building is attached or detached, the number of stories and the architectural style.
The NUMBER OF UNITS refers to the number of separate households that the building is designed to accommodate. Although usage may vary in different areas, the term “house” is most often used to refer to a SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE. If a building has multiple units that share a common access and other common areas, it is usually referred to as an APARTMENT BUILDING.
A DETACHED HOUSE is one that is not connected to any other property. ATTACHED HOUSES share one or more walls, called “party walls,” that are jointly owned by the two adjoining properties. ROW HOUSES, common in many urban areas, are an example of attached dwellings. Ownership of an attached dwelling often involves a PARTY WALL AGREEMENT, which assigns responsibility for maintenance and repair of the party wall(s) (see Figure 7-1).
A. TYPES OF HOUSES
The “type of house” refers to the number of stories or levels in the house, and their relationship to each other.
Although modern construction methods allow for all sorts of variations, the vast majority of houses fall into five basic “type” categories (see Figure 7-2): - one-story,
- one and one-half story,
- two-story,
- split-level, and
- bi-level (also known as split-entry or raised ranch).
215
Chapter 7
Figure 7-1
Attached Houses
Multiples (Apartments)
Town House
Duplexes Row House
Illustrations courtesy of Marshall & Swift
Figure 7-2
Types of Houses
One Story
Bi-Level
One and One-Half Story
Two Story
Illustrations courtesy of Marshall & Swift
Split Level - One-Story House
A ONE-STORY HOUSE, often called a “ranch” or “rambler,” has its entire living area on the ground floor. It may or may not have a BASEMENT, which is a room of full story height located below the first floor, at least partially below ground level, and primarily not used for living accommodations.
216
Residential Construction
The advantages of one-story houses include: ease of exterior maintenance, flexibility of floor plan design and the fact that there are no stairs to climb.
On the down side, this type of house is relatively expensive to build; by comparison, a two-story house with the same exterior dimensions has twice the living area, with essentially no extra cost for roof or foundation. (Roof costs for a one-story house are often minimized by using a low pitched roofline.)
One-story houses also require a greater amount of lot space in relation to the amount of living area, so they may be inappropriate or impractical on small or narrow lots. - One and One-Half Story House
Also known as a Cape Cod, the ONE AND ONE-HALF STORY HOUSE has a steeply pitched roof that permits part of the attic area to be used for living space. Roof dormers, which add to the amount of usable upstairs space, are a common feature of this type of house. As in the case of one-story houses, the foundation may or may not include a basement. Construction costs per square foot tend to be lower for one and one-half story houses than for one-story houses.
One and one-half story houses are often built with expandability in mind. Because the ground floor normally has at least one bedroom (and sometimes two), the upstairs level can be left unfinished until the extra space is needed. However, ease of expandability will depend on the quality of the original design and construction, which should allow for adequate access (stairs), ventilation (windows) and plumbing (bathrooms) on the attic level. - Two-Story House
Compared to a one-story or one and one-half story house, the two-story house is more economical in terms of construction cost per square foot of living space.
The reason for the economy is that square footage can be doubled without doubling foundation and roof system costs. This design also allows for the most living space on a given size of lot. Bedrooms are normally located on the upper floor, providing a natural separation between the public and private areas of the house.
A concern with all multi-level houses is the design and efficiency of heating and cooling systems. Because heat rises, a poorly designed system will make it difficult to keep the lower level warm in winter, and the upstairs cool in the summer.
With a well designed system, however, heating and cooling efficiency may actually be greater than for single-story houses, since the building has less exterior surface area relative to the amount of heated or cooled interior space. - Split-Level House
A SPLIT-LEVEL HOUSE has three or four different levels, which are staggered so that each level is separated from the next by half of a flight of stairs. Bedrooms and baths are located
217
Chapter 7
on the top level. Half a flight down are the main entry, living room, dining room and kitchen. Down another half-story, beneath the bedroom level, is space for a family room, den or spare bedroom; the garage is often located on this level as well. A fourth level, equivalent to a basement, may be located below the living/dining/kitchen space.
The design of a split-level home lends itself to a sloped lot, where the garage and main entry can both open out at grade level. On a flat site, the main entry will be raised one- half story above the finished grade.
A split-level house has some of the same benefits as a two-story house in terms of construction, cost efficiency and natural separation of the various functional areas of the home. - Bi-Level House
A BI-LEVEL or SPLIT-ENTRY HOUSE has two main levels, one atop the other, with an entry or foyer located on a level halfway between. The lower level is sunk about halfway below ground, so the entry is even with the grade level. This design is sometimes called a “raised ranch,” since it is essentially a one-story home with a finished basement that has been raised partially out of the ground. The main rooms of the house are all on the upper level, with the lower story used for a family room or rec room, and perhaps a spare bedroom.
Since the lower level of a split-entry house is partly below ground, special care must be taken to provide adequate insulation and moisture proofing. Another drawback to this design is the lack of a basement or crawlspace in which to run pipes and ductwork.
Nevertheless, split-entry homes are cost-effective to build, and the finished lower level space is considered part of the “gross living area” for appraisal purposes in many parts of the country.
II. Architectural Styles
ARCHITECTURAL STYLE is the character of a building’s form and ornamentation.
If homebuyers in a particular area do not find a particular architectural style desirable, homes of that style are likely to sell for less than similar size homes having architectural styles which are more desirable within that community.
Architectural styles have traditionally been influenced by local factors such as climate and the availability of different building materials.
There are many examples of traditional architectural styles that are adapted to a particular location: Spanish style houses with thick adobe walls and tile roofs in the southwest desert, Southern Colonial houses with deep shaded porches in the hot, humid South, or Cape Cod style homes designed for protection from cold northern winds in New England (see Figure 7-3).
218
Residential Construction
Figure 7-3
Examples of Different Architectural Styles
Colonial Cape Cod (1) Cape Cod (2)
Cottage Victorian Mediterranean
Southern
Saltbox
Ranch
Chalet “A” Frame Contemporary
Illustrations courtesy of Marshall & Swift
219
Chapter 7
Local traditional styles can still be found in many areas, but location is much less of an influence on architectural style than it used to be.
Builders are no longer limited to using local materials, since modern transportation systems make different building materials widely available at reasonable costs. The invention of central heating and cooling, as well as improved insulating materials, has broadened the range of architectural styles that can be adapted to local climates.
A. COMPATIBILITY
COMPATIBILITY means that a building is in harmony with its use or uses and its environment. In terms of value, one type or style of house is not inherently better or worse than any other. What is most important to value is the compatibility of the design. Compatibility has several different aspects. To maximize value, the design of a house should be compatible with the designs of other homes in the area, with the physical❓ and environmental characteristics of the building site, with the materials used in the construction, and with the preferences of the local market.
First of all, the design of a house should be compatible with the styles of other houses in the local neighborhood.
The market may welcome a limited degree of uniqueness in design, but value will generally suffer if the design contrasts too radically with surrounding houses.
Subdivision developers often impose design restrictions on their developments, because they know that compatibility of design will have a positive impact on property values in the subdivision.
Case/Example: A contemporary style house located in a neighborhood of other contemporary style houses is likely to be viewed positively by the market. But the same house located in a neighborhood of traditional style homes might seem “out-of-place,” and its value could suffer as a result.
Compatibility of design also refers to the suitability of the design for the particular building lot and location. Value is enhanced by a design that takes advantage of physical site characteristics, such as views. The design should also be appropriate for the topography of the site. For example, split-level designs often work well on hilly sites, while colonial style houses do not. Finally, the design should be appropriate for the local climate. A design that is specifically adapted to a hot desert climate, for example, would be inappropriate in an area with cool, rainy weather.
A building’s architectural style is often defined at least in part by the materials used in its construction. Spanish style homes have clay tile roofs, Tudor’s utilize timber framing, contemporary designs incorporate large areas of glass. A compatible design is one where the materials are appropriate to the style.
Case/Example: A clay tile roof on a Cape Cod house would look ridiculous to most potential homebuyers.
The final aspect of design compatibility is perhaps the most important: the design must be compatible with the demands of the market.
220
Residential Construction
The popularity of any given design is influenced by the economic and social forces that affect value. As lifestyles and demographics change, so does the demand for different design features in housing.
Ultimately, it is the local market that determines what is a “good” design, and what is a
“bad” one.
Case/Example: A development of new contemporary style houses is built in an older community with mostly traditional style housing. If the market places an emphasis on the historic character of the community, the contemporary homes will be viewed as incompatible, and their value will suffer. On the other hand, if market forces are creating a demand for more modern housing in the community, the contemporary homes may not be incompatible at all, but may simply represent a new trend in community standards.
III. Elements of House Design
An appraiser must be able to identify the various elements of house design and evaluate any defects in those elements. The elements of house design include siting, interior functional zones, and room characteristics.
He or she may use mobile apps to reproduce accurate renderings to use for comparison purposes.
A. SITING
SITING refers to the placement of the house on the building lot. Placement is normally limited to some extent by building code set-back requirements, which call for minimum distances between the house and the property’s boundaries. Topographic considerations such as slopes or poor soil conditions may also limit where the house may be placed on the lot. Within these limits, however, careful placement of the house on the lot can have a significant impact on value.
There are four basic considerations in designing the placement of a house on its lot: orientation to the sun, orientation to prevailing storm winds, orientation to views, and the division of the lot into functional zones (see Figure 7-4).
Appraisers can create figures like the one above by using appropriate mobile apps.
Orientation to the sun affects the amount of light and heat that can enter the house. In most areas, a design where the living areas of the house face south is considered optimum. This orientation takes best advantage of natural lighting in the most used areas of the home, and helps maximize solar heat gain in the winter. Excessive summer heat gain can be avoided by using wide roof overhangs, which shade the house in summer when the sun is high in the sky, but allow light and heat to penetrate in the winter when the sun’s path is lower.
Screening with deciduous trees is another effective way to block the summer sun but still allow it to shine through in the winter when the trees are bare.
221
Chapter 7
Figure 7-4
Exterior Functional Zone Example - Windbreak Layout
Cold Winter Wind
7 P.M. Sun
(low)
4 P.M. Sun
(high)
Morning
Sun
Cooling Summer Breeze
Noon Sun
(high)
In some areas, orientation to prevailing storm winds is an important siting consideration. In areas that are subject to frequent or heavy storms from a particular direction, it is best to minimize the amount of window area that is directly exposed to the winds, in order to cut down on heat loss. Entries should also be sheltered from the direct path of the storms.
An attractive view can add significantly to the value of a house. Views should be visible from the most used areas of the house. Even if the site does not have an attractive territorial view, careful landscaping can provide a pleasant view of the lot from the living area.
The last aspect of house siting is the division of the lot into functional areas or zones, the so-called public, private, and service zones. The area that can be viewed from the street frontage is the public zone. Areas shielded from the street by the house, or by fencing or other landscaping, constitute the private area. The service area includes access ways (driveway, walkways, etc.) and outdoor storage areas. Good design maximizes the amount of private area available for household activities.
B. INTERIOR FUNCTIONAL ZONE
An appraiser cannot underestimate the importance of FUNCTIONAL UTILITY, which concerns a building’s ability to perform the function for which it is intended according to current
222
Residential Construction
market tastes and standards; as well as the efficiency of use in terms of architectural style, design and layout, traffic patterns, and the size and type of rooms.
A well-designed house should provide space for three basic activities: living, working, and sleeping.
Ideally, the spaces provided for each of these activities should be separated, so that one activity does not interfere with another. For example, bedrooms should be located where they will not be disturbed by activities in the living and working areas of the house.
Figure 7-5 shows how the spaces for the three different activities can be separated into zones. The LIVING ZONE includes the public areas of the house: the living room, dining room, family room and guest bath. The WORKING ZONE is comprised of the kitchen and laundry/ utility room. Bedrooms and private baths are located in the SLEEPING ZONE.
Figure 7-5 Interior Functional Zones
LIVING ZONE
Family
Room
Living
Room
Master
Bedroom
Fireplace
Ba.
Ba.
WORKING ZONE
Kitchen
Laundry Ba.
Dining
Area
Ent.
Bedroom Bedroom
SLEEPING ZONE
Garage
(Appraisers can create similar figures by using floorplan apps online.)
The separate activity areas of the home are connected by hallways, stairs and entry ways, which are sometimes referred to as a fourth zone of the house, the CIRCULATION ZONE. While the three activity zones should be designed to provide separation of the activities, they should also allow for easy circulation between and within zones.
Design features that affect desirability affect value because value is determined by supply and demand features of the marketplace.
223
Chapter 7
A house’s value is affected by the building’s FLOOR PLAN, which is an architectural drawing indicating the exact layout of rooms and illustrating the functional or nonfunctional relationship between them. Structures with wasted space might lack space where it is otherwise desired so that the property will be less desirable to buyers than similar size homes.
How the designer allocates space affects desirability for many buyers. An example is while a custom 3,000 square foot home might have only two bedrooms because that is what the original owner wanted, to most potential buyers, the design would be a negative feature.
Case/Example: In a retirement oriented community, a two-story home without a bedroom on the first level is likely to be far less desirable than one with this feature.
C. ROOM CHARACTERISTICS - Kitchens
The kitchen is commonly the most used room of the house, so its design and location have a large impact on the functionality of the overall floor plan.
Kitchens should be conveniently accessible from both the main entrance and service entrance of the house, and should be located adjacent to the dining room and family room, if these rooms are included in the design. Also, the kitchen should be designed so that it is not necessary to walk through the working area in order to reach other rooms of the house.
A critical aspect of kitchen design is the work triangle, which is formed by the sink, refrigerator, and range. The distances between the three points of the work triangle can make the difference between an efficient kitchen design and a poor one. If the distances are too small, the kitchen will be cramped; if they are too great, preparing a meal will seem like a five-mile hike. A distance of four to seven feet between each point of the work triangle is considered optimal (see Figure 7-6).
Figure 7-6 Kitchen Work Triangle
SINK
REFRIGERATOR
STOVE
224
Residential Construction
Kitchen sizes vary considerably. Eighty square feet of space (8’ x 10’) is considered a minimum, but kitchens twice that size are not uncommon. Larger kitchens often include an eating area or family activity area. The design should include adequate counter and cabinet space, and plenty of electrical outlets for kitchen appliances.
Lighting and ventilation are important considerations in kitchen design. Overhead lights should illuminate all areas of the kitchen, and a vent or fan should be located over the cooking area to allow cooking fumes to escape. Natural lighting is desirable, but the placement of windows can be a problem. The best location for a kitchen window is over the sink. Additional windows are desirable so long as they do not take up space needed for wall cabinets.
Windows should never be placed over the cooking area. - Laundry/Utility Rooms
Laundry areas are best located where they are convenient to the sleeping area of the house, off the bedroom hallway for example. However, location of the laundry area is not as critical as most other rooms of the house, and laundries are often located in the garage or basement.
The laundry area should be well-ventilated, and located where noise from the appliances will not disturb others. - Living Rooms
The living room is the main public room of the house.
It should be located near the main (guest) entry, be separated from the sleeping area, and preferably be on the south side of the house. If the house has a dining room, it should be next to the living room. It should not be necessary to cross through the living room in order to reach the kitchen or bedrooms.
The size and shape of the living room should allow for easy arrangement of furniture. About 200 square feet is the minimum size, and rectangular shaped rooms tend to work best for furniture placement. The modern trend is for smaller living rooms, particularly in homes with a separate family/recreation room. - Family Rooms
In many areas, the FAMILY ROOM (also called a recreation room) has taken over the role of the living room as the main center of entertainment and socializing in the house. As part of the living zone, the family room should be separated from the sleeping zone; however, it is usually considered an advantage if the family room is next to (or near) the kitchen.
Since the family room is a center of activity for household members, direct access to the outside is also an asset.
225
Chapter 7 - Dining Rooms
Dining rooms may be formal or informal. A formal dining room or area is a separate room that is designed for that purpose. Informal dining areas are usually attached to or part of the kitchen itself, and may take the form of a nook or alcove.
The main considerations for the dining area are that it should be large enough to accommodate a dining table and chairs (including room to get in and out of the table), and it should have easy access to the kitchen so that food does not have to be carried through other areas of the house. - Bedrooms
The number of bedrooms has a major effect on house value.
Normally, homes with different numbers of bedrooms appeal to different segments of the market, that is, to families of different sizes or lifestyles. The average household size in the market will have a large impact on the desirability of three- or four-bedroom homes, as opposed to two-bedroom homes.
Ideally, bedrooms should all be located in a separate sleeping zone, to provide both privacy and noise insulation. The most common arrangement is to locate the bedrooms on a separate story or wing. Each bedroom should have convenient access to a bathroom, either directly or via a private hallway. Also, it should not be necessary to go through a bedroom to reach another room (other than a private bath).
Depending on the room layout, a size of 9’ x 10’ is the minimum needed to allow for a single bed, 10’ x 12’ for a double bed. Whether larger room sizes will add to value depends on local market preferences. Most homes have at least one bedroom that is larger than the others, the MASTER BEDROOM. Modern master bedrooms will often have walk-in closets and other amenities.
Each bedroom should have its own clo
The scientific summary, based on the provided text, for the “Site Valuation Methods: Cost & Sales Comparison” chapter is as follows:
Scientific Summary: Site Valuation Methods: Cost & Sales Comparison
This chapter, situated within a broader course on appraisal fundamentals, addresses two key methods of site valuation: the Cost Approach and the Sales Comparison Approach. The fundamental economic principle underpinning this section is that land, as a finite resource, holds intrinsic value. Understanding site value is crucial for various valuation techniques, particularly the Cost Approach, which relies on a separate site valuation to estimate total property value. Legal requirements, such as property tax assessments and condemnation proceedings, may also mandate separate site valuations, aligning with the course’s emphasis on “value” being context-dependent and qualified by specific definitions.
The Cost Approach assumes property value is the sum of the site value and the depreciated replacement cost❓❓ of improvements. This relies on the principle of substitution❓ – a buyer will pay no more for a property than the cost to acquire an equivalent site and build a new structure. Accurately estimating depreciation, the difference between replacement cost and current value of improvements, is critical but challenging.
The Sales Comparison Approach, also known as the market approach, estimates site value by analyzing❓ recent sales prices of similar properties (comparables). Its effectiveness hinges on two scientific principles: (1) identifying truly comparable properties, sharing similar characteristics and appealing to the same buyer pool; and (2) accurately adjusting comparable sales prices to account for any differences between the subject site and the comparables. adjustments❓ compensate for quantifiable differences (e.g., an extra bathroom), thereby isolating the value attributable to the site itself.
The course description emphasizes that “value is an opinion, not a fact.” Both the Cost and Sales Comparison approaches generate “value indicators.” Ultimately, the appraiser must reconcile these indicators, recognizing that each approach relies on assumptions and data, and thus carries its own uncertainty. The choice of which approach to prioritize depends on the specific appraisal problem and the reliability of available data. This reconciliation process, detailed further in the book, aligns with the course’s goal of providing a “solid foundation for confident and informed appraisal practices.” The chapter provides formulas, like ‘Subject Value = Comparable Sales Price +/- Adjustments,’ to formalize the process. Furthermore, the text highlights the income approach, which is also related to the property value.