Site Valuation Methods: Applying Cost, Sales, and Income Approaches

Site Valuation Methods: Applying Cost, Sales, and Income Approaches

Okay, here’s the detailed scientific content for a chapter entitled “Site Valuation Methods: Applying Cost, Sales, and Income Approaches” in your training course “Mastering Appraisal Adjustments: Unlock Property Valuation Secrets,” based on the book content you provided. I’ve focused on scientific depth, relevant terminology, practical applications, and incorporating the course description.

Chapter 6: Site Valuation Methods: Applying Cost, Sales, and Income Approaches

Introduction

Site valuation, the process of determiningโ“ the economic worth of land, is a cornerstone of real estate appraisal. This chapter delves into the scientific principles underpinning site valuation methodologies, linking them to the core competencies of appraisal adjustment analysis as outlined in the course description, “Mastering Appraisal Adjustments: Unlock Property Valuation Secrets.” Understanding how to accurately value land is essential, as this value forms the basis for crucial appraisal techniques such as the cost approach and the building residual technique within income capitalization. Furthermore, accurate site valuation is crucial for analyzing highest and best use, and in some jurisdictions, is mandated by law for property tax assessment or condemnation proceedings. This chapter will equip you with the knowledge and skills to navigate complex site valuation scenarios, ensuring precise and reliable property valuations by explicitly integrating site value adjustments to the three approaches to value.

I. The Crucial Role of Site Valuation in the Three Approaches to Value

As this course emphasizes mastering adjustment techniques, it is important to address how a valid site valuation is used in each of the valuation approaches. This course is designed to allow appraisers to accurately compare properties, identify influencing factors, and confidently determine market valueโ“โ“ by considering property rights, financing nuances, conditions of sale, post-sale expenditures, market fluctuations, and locational variances.

  • Cost Approach:

    • The Cost Approach directly uses site value. This approach operates under the principle of substitution, suggesting that a rational buyer will pay no more for a property than the cost to acquire an equivalent site and construct a new improvement with similar utility. This requires:

      • An independent and supportable site valuation.
      • Accurate estimation of current construction costs of the improvements.
      • Deduction for accrued depreciation (physical deterioration, functional obsolescence, and external obsolescence).
      • Formula:
        • Property Value (Cost Approach) = Site Value + Reproduction/Replacement Cost - Accrued Depreciation
      • The site valuation provides the baseline for the entire calculation. Inaccurate site valuation will propagate errors throughout the entire cost approach.
      • Adjustment Relevance: In applying the cost approach, if there are comparable sales of vacant land, appraisers must make adjustments based on location, size, zoning, and other relevant differences with the subject site. This aligns directly with the core skillset of appraisal adjustments.
      • sales comparison approachโ“โ“ (Market Approach):
    • Even in the sales comparison approach, where improved comparable properties are directly analyzed, site value plays an important role. The sales price of a comparable represents the combined value of the land and the improvements. When significant differences exist between the site characteristics of the comparable and the subject property, appraisers must perform adjustments to account for these differences. This is particularly relevant in cases where lot size, views, or locational factors vary.

      • Adjustment Relevance: Sales comparison requires adjustments to the overall sale price. If a comparable has a smaller lot size than the subject, we would need to make a positive adjustment to the comparable. The amount of the adjustment should be based on market data reflecting the value differential associated with lot size differences. Reliable site valuation techniques (such as sales comparison of vacant lots) are crucial to deriving a supportable adjustment amount.
    • Income Approach:

    • Land Residual Technique: In income-producing properties, the land residual technique (covered in detail later) isolates the income attributable to the land component. This method relies on capitalizing the residual income to estimate the site value.

      • The land residual method can be used to determine the value of the land as a component of value for an existing income producing property. The annual net operating income of the land can be determined as the income remaining to the land after the income attributable to the building has been deducted from the total net operating income.
      • Adjustment Relevance: The accurate determination of net operating income (NOI) is crucial. Adjustments must be made to reflect prevailing market rents, vacancy rates, and operating expenses. Since the objective is to isolate the income attributable to the land, accuracy in the income estimation is vital.
      • Steps to complete the land residual method:
      • Step 1 - Arrive at a reliable indication of value for the improved property, supported by market analysis, the cost approach or income approach.
      • Step 2 - Estimate the current cost of replacing the existing improvements.
      • Step 3 - Select capitalization rates appropriate for the improvements and the land.
      • Step 4 - Determine the annual net operating income attributable to the land.
        • Formula: Income to land = Net Operating Income - (Replacement Cost x Building Capitalization Rate)
      • Step 5 - Capitalize the income to the land at the selected land capitalization rate.
        • Formula: Land Value = Income to Land / Land Capitalization Rate

II. Core Principles of Site Valuation

  • Highest and Best Use (HBU) Analysis: The linchpin of any valuation, especially site valuation, is a rigorous HBU analysis. This involves determining the most probable and legal use of the site that is physically possible, appropriately supported, financially feasible, and that results in the highest value. This aligns with the goal of ensuring precise and reliable property valuations.

    • The Four Tests of HBU:

      1. Legally Permissible: Is the use allowed by zoning, deed restrictions, and other legal constraints?
      2. Physically Possible: Can the site accommodate the proposed use, considering size, topography, soil conditions, access, and utilities?
      3. Financially Feasible: Will the use generate sufficient revenue to cover operating expenses, debt service, and provide a reasonable return on investment?
      4. Maximally Productive: Among all feasible uses, which one produces the highest value for the site?
    • HBU as Vacant vs. Improved: It’s critical to distinguish HBU “as if vacant” from HBU “as improved.” For example, a site with an old, underperforming building may have a higher value if cleared for redevelopment. This requires a comparative analysis, considering demolition costs, carrying costs, and potential income streams.

  • Principle of Substitution: As mentioned in the Cost Approach description, a prudent buyer will pay no more for a property (including the site) than the cost of acquiring a substitute. This underscores the importance of identifying comparable sites with similar utility and development potential.

  • Principle of Anticipation: Value is a function of expected future benefits. In site valuation, this means considering the potential for future development, zoning changes, or infrastructure improvements that could increase the site’s value.

III. Site Valuation Methodologies: Detailed Explanation and Application

Here, we examine the primary methods for site valuation, detailing the scientific basis and practical application of each.

  • A. Sales Comparison Approach (Market Extraction): This is the most direct and preferred method when sufficient data exists.

    • Scientific Basis: Relies on the principle of substitution. The value of the subject site is directly related to the sale prices of comparable sites adjusted for any differences.
    • Process:

      1. Data Collection: Gather detailed information on recent sales of comparable vacant sites. This includes sale price, date of sale, location, physical characteristics (size, shape, topography), zoning, utility availability, and any known environmental issues.
      2. Verification: Confirm the accuracy of the sales data through reliable sources (title companies, county records, brokers involved in the transactions).
      3. Adjustment Process: Adjust the sale prices of the comparable sites to account for any differences with the subject site.
        • Formula: Subject Value = Comparable Sales Price ยฑ Adjustments
        • Adjustments should be market-derived, reflecting the impact of each difference on value. Common adjustments include:
          • Financing Terms (CF): If the comparable sale included atypical financing, adjust to a cash-equivalent basis.
            • CF = Cost to cure any differences in financing
          • Conditions of Sale (CS): Remove any premiums or discounts due to motivated buyers or sellers, foreclosure sales, or relationships between the parties.
            • CS = Cost to cure any premiums or discounts that would not be typical for the current market
          • Market Conditions (MC): Account for changes in market conditions between the date of the comparable sale and the date of valuation.
            • MC = Change in Market conditions
          • Location (L): Adjust for differences in location attributes (access, visibility, proximity to amenities).
            • L = The cost to cure any distance differences between the subject and comparable location
          • Physical Characteristics (PC): Account for differences in size, shape, topography, soil conditions, or environmental factors.
            • PC = Cost to cure any differences in size or shape
          • Zoning and Development Potential (Z): Adjust for differences in permitted uses, density restrictions, or development costs imposed by zoning regulations.
            • Z = The cost to cure any restrictions imposed by zoning
          • Adjusted Sales Price = Sale Price ยฑ CF ยฑ CS ยฑ MC ยฑ L ยฑ PC ยฑ Z
      4. Reconciliation: Analyze the adjusted sales prices of the comparable sites and reconcile them into a final value opinion for the subject site. More weight should be given to comparables requiring fewer and smaller adjustments.
        • Example:
      • Subject Site: 1 acre, residential zoning, good location
      • Comparable 1: 1.2 acres, residential zoning, average location, sold for $120,000 one month ago. Adjustment: - $5,000 (location). Adjusted Sales Price = $115,000
      • Comparable 2: 0.9 acres, residential zoning, good location, sold for $95,000 three months ago. Adjustment: + $8,000 (Size, $8,000 to account for the smaller size of the comparable), +$2,000 (Market Conditions). Adjusted Sales Price = $105,000
      • Reconciled Value: A reasonable opinion of value might be $110,000 to $115,000, weighting Comparable 1 more heavily, due to the more similar size and date of sale (the adjustments are smaller).
  • B. Allocation Method: This method estimates land value based on a typical ratio of land value to overall property value observed in the market.

    • Scientific Basis: Assumes a consistent relationship between land and improvement values for similar properties.
    • Process:

      1. Determine Market Ratio: Research typical land-to-value ratios for similar properties in the area. This can be obtained from sales data, assessor’s records, or market surveys.
      2. Estimate Overall Property Value: Determine the market value of the subject property as a whole, using appropriate appraisal techniques (sales comparison, cost, or income approach).
      3. Apply Ratio: Multiply the overall property value by the determined land-to-value ratio to estimate the site value.

        • Formula: Site Value = Overall Property Value x Land-to-Value Ratio
          • Limitations: This method is highly dependent on the accuracy of the market ratio, which can vary significantly based on property characteristics. Itโ€™s most reliable when applied to relatively homogeneous properties.
          • Example:
      • Similar improved properties in the subject’s neighborhood sell for an average of $250,000.
      • Market research indicates a typical land-to-value ratio of 20% for these properties.
      • Estimated Site Value: $250,000 x 0.20 = $50,000
  • C. Extraction Method: This involves subtracting the depreciated cost of improvements from the total property value to arrive at the land value.

    • Scientific Basis: Based on the principle that property value is the sum of its land and improvement components.
    • Process:

      1. Estimate Overall Property Value: As with allocation, determine the market value of the improved property using appropriate appraisal techniques.
      2. Estimate Improvement Cost: Estimate the current cost of replacing the existing improvements.
      3. Estimate Accrued Depreciation: Determine the amount of accrued depreciation (physical, functional, and external obsolescence) affecting the improvements. This requires a detailed inspection and analysis.
      4. Calculate Depreciated Improvement Cost: Subtract accrued depreciation from the replacement cost to arrive at the depreciated improvement cost.

        • Formula: Depreciated Improvement Cost = Replacement Cost - Accrued Depreciation
          5. Subtract from Overall Value: Subtract the depreciated improvement cost from the overall property value to estimate the site value.

        • Formula: Site Value = Overall Property Value - Depreciated Improvement Cost

    • Limitations: This method is only reliable if the depreciation can be accurately estimated and requires high reliance on replacement cost estimates.

    • Example:

      • An improved property recently sold for $300,000.
      • The estimated replacement cost of the improvements is $200,000.
      • The estimated accrued depreciation is $50,000.
      • Estimated Site Value: $300,000 - ($200,000 - $50,000) = $150,000
  • D. Development Method (Subdivision Analysis): This is used primarily for valuing large tracts of land suitable for subdivision into smaller building lots.

    • Scientific Basis: Present value of future income. The value of the raw land is derived from the present value of the expected net proceeds from the sale of the finished lots.
    • Process:

      1. Development Plan: Create a detailed plan for subdividing and developing the land, including lot sizes, street layout, infrastructure requirements, and zoning compliance.
      2. Market Analysis: Conduct a market study to determine the absorption rate (how quickly the lots can be sold) and the expected sales prices of the finished lots.
      3. Cost Estimation: Estimate all development costs, including:
        • Engineering and surveying fees.
        • Legal and administrative expenses.
        • Site preparation (clearing, grading).
        • Infrastructure costs (roads, utilities).
        • Marketing and sales expenses.
        • Financing costs (interest on construction loans).
        • Developer’s profit.
      4. Cash Flow Projection: Develop a cash flow projection, estimating the revenues from lot sales and the expenses incurred over the development period.
      5. Discounting: Discount the projected cash flows back to their present value using an appropriate discount rate to reflect the risk and time value of money. The discount rate must align with typical investor return expectations for similar projects.

        • Formula: Present Value = โˆ‘ (Cash Flow in Year t / (1 + Discount Rate)^t)

          • Where: โˆ‘ = Sum of
          • t = Year
            6. Land Value: The present value of the net cash flows represents the estimated value of the raw land.
            • Challenges: This method relies heavily on accurate forecasts of future sales prices, development costs, and absorption rates. Small errors in these estimations can lead to significant value discrepancies.
            • Example:
              Total Expected Revenue $5,000,000
              Total Development Costs $2,000,000
              Total Projected Profit $3,000,000
              Discount Rate 10%
              Present Value (Rounded and based on a 2 year sale period) = $2,727,272
              This means the value of the land today is $2,727,272.
  • E. Land Residual Technique: This isolates the income attributable to the land and capitalizes it to determine land value.

    • Scientific Basis: A component of income capitalization. The value of an asset is related to the net income it generates.
    • Process:

      1. Estimate Overall NOI: Determine the stabilized net operating income (NOI) for the improved property.
      2. Estimate Improvement Value: Estimate the current market value of the building and any other improvements.
      3. Select Building Capitalization Rate: Choose a capitalization rate that reflects the risk and return requirements for investments in similar types of buildings.
      4. Calculate Income Attributable to Improvements: Multiply the building value by the building capitalization rate to determine the annual income attributable to the improvements.

        • Formula: Income to Improvements = Building Value x Building Cap Rate
          5. Calculate Residual Income to Land: Subtract the income attributable to the improvements from the overall NOI to arrive at the residual income attributable to the land.

        • Formula: Income to Land = Overall NOI - Income to Improvements
          6. Select Land Capitalization Rate: Choose a capitalization rate that reflects the risk and return requirements for investments in land.
          7. Capitalize Land Income: Divide the income attributable to the land by the land capitalization rate to estimate the site value.

        • Formula: Site Value = Income to Land / Land Cap Rate

    • Challenges: Selection of the appropriate capitalization rates for both the building and the land is crucial. Market extraction is the preferred way to derive land cap rates. A minor error can significantly affect the resulting land value.
      Example:
      NOI $300,000
      Building Value $2,000,000
      Building Cap Rate 8%
      Land Capitalization Rate 6%
      Income to Improvements $2,000,000 x 8% = $160,000
      Income to Land = NOI - Income to Improvements $300,000 - $160,000 = $140,000
      Land Value = Income to Land / Land Cap Rate $140,000 / 6% = $2,333,333

  • F. Ground Rent Capitalization: This involves capitalizing the ground rent paid under a long-term lease.

    • Scientific Basis: Value is a function of income stream. If land is leased under a ground lease, the rent payments represent the income attributable to the land.
    • Process:

      1. Determine Ground Rent: Determine the annual ground rent paid under the lease.
      2. Select Capitalization Rate: Choose a capitalization rate that reflects the risk and return requirements for investments in land under a long term lease. This capitalization rate should consider the creditworthiness of the lessee and the terms of the lease.
      3. Capitalize Ground Rent: Divide the annual ground rent by the capitalization rate to estimate the site value.

        • Formula: Site Value = Annual Ground Rent / Capitalization Rate
    • Caveats:

      • Lease Terms: Careful consideration must be given to the lease terms, including any rent escalation clauses, renewal options, or restrictions on land use.
      • Reversionary Value: If the lease term is shorter than the economic life of the improvements to be constructed on the site, there may be a reversionary value of the site to the lessee.
      • Market Alignment: Ground rents are not always aligned with market rates. Be cautious to examine that the rent is in alignment.
        Example:
      • Annual Ground Rent $100,000
        Capitalization Rate 7%
        Land Value = Annual Ground Rent / Capitalization Rate* $100,000 / 7% = $1,428,571.
  • G. Depth Tables

  • Appraisers use depth tables to assist in measuring the effect of additional depth in value as compared to the standard table. An appraiser uses the 4-3-2-1 depth table assuming the highest value is located in the front part of a lot

IV. Case Studies and Practical Exercises

(Note: Case studies and practical exercises, where participants apply the methodologies and adjustments learned, will be added here to the training.)
Example: Case Study โ€“ Sales Comparison Approach

John is completing an appraisal using the sales comparison approach. The subject lot size is 11,000 sq ft with zoning allowing for single family residential use. Comparables in the same neighborhood as the subject property have the following sale data.
Sale Price - $450,000; 10,000 sq ft Lot; average zoning for SFH
Adjustment: Positive adjustment of $5,000 to account for difference in lot size; Negative adjustment of $1,000 to account for slightly lower end zoning.
Sale Price - $475,000; 10,500 sq ft Lot; comparable zoning for SFH
Adjustment: Positive adjustment of $1,000 to account for differences in zoning; $3,000 Market Conditions Adjustment; 1 acre lot, 1-mile difference in location requires a positive adjustment of $1,500.
*Sale Price - $400,000; 9,000 sq ft Lot; average zoning for SFH
Adjustment: Positive adjustment of $8,000 to account for differences in zoning; $3,000 Market Conditions Adjustment; 1 acre lot, requires a positive adjustment of $1,000.

Considering all the comparables the estimated value of Johnโ€™s subject lot is between $412,000 - $481,500.

V. Reconciliation and Final Value Opinion

After applying each of the relevant site valuation methods, the appraiser must reconcile the value indications into a single, defensible value opinion. This involves weighing the strengths and weaknesses of each method, considering the quality and reliability of the data used, and exercising sound professional judgment.

  • Example: In cases where the sales comparison approach is well-supported by market data and is aligned with both the allocation and extraction methods, then greater weight should be given to the sales comparison approach. If this is not the case and reliable data has been used in all three approaches then reconciliation should be based on mathematical averages of the three.

VI. Reporting and Disclosure

The final step is to clearly and concisely report the site valuation process, including:

  • A detailed description of the subject site and its key characteristics.
  • The methodology(s) used to estimate site value.
  • A summary of the data sources and analysis performed.
  • A clear statement of the final value opinion and the reasoning behind it.
  • Disclosure of any assumptions, limiting conditions, or extraordinary assumptions that affected the valuation.

VII. Conclusion

Accurate site valuation is an essential element of sound real estate appraisal practice. By mastering the principles and methodologies outlined in this chapter, and effectively applying appraisal adjustment techniques to account for market nuances, you will be well-equipped to provide reliable and credible value opinions in a wide range of appraisal assignments. This course’s focus on appraisal adjustments and unlocking property valuation secrets, combined with a strong understanding of site valuation, will allow you to confidently navigate complex scenarios and achieve expertise in real estate appraisal.

Chapter Summary

  1. list the three basic activity zones of a house and describe their relationships to each other;
  2. describe the characteristics that affect functional utility in the various rooms of a
    house,
  3. identify the characteristics of various building components that can affect value, and
  4. understand the technical terminology used to describe residential construction.
    I. Classification of Houses
    Houses are generally classified on the basis of four characteristics: the number of units, whetherโ“ the building is attached or detached, the number of stories and the architectural style.
    The NUMBER OF UNITS refers to the number of separate households that the building is designed to accommodate. Although usage may vary in different areas, the term โ€œhouseโ€ is most often used to refer to a SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE. If a building has multiple units that share a common access and other common areas, it is usually referred to as an APARTMENT BUILDING.
    A DETACHED HOUSE is one that is not connected to any other property. ATTACHED HOUSES share one or more walls, called โ€œparty walls,โ€ that are jointly owned by the two adjoining properties. ROW HOUSES, common in many urban areas, are an example of attached dwellings. Ownership of an attached dwelling often involves a PARTY WALL AGREEMENT, which assigns responsibility for maintenance and repair of the party wall(s) (see Figure 7-1).
    A. TYPES OF HOUSES
    The โ€œtype of houseโ€ refers to the number of stories or levels in the house, and their relationship to each other.
    Although modern construction methods allow for all sorts of variations, the vast majority of houses fall into five basic โ€œtypeโ€ categories (see Figure 7-2):
  5. one-story,
  6. one and one-half story,
  7. two-story,
  8. split-level, and
  9. bi-level (also known as split-entry or raised ranch).

  10. One-Story House
    A ONE-STORY HOUSE, often called a โ€œranchโ€ or โ€œrambler,โ€ has its entire living area on the ground floor. It may or may not have a BASEMENT, which is a room of full story height located below the first floor, at least partially below ground level, and primarily not used for living accommodations.
    216
    Residential Construction
    The advantages of one-story houses include: ease of exterior maintenance, flexibility of floor plan design and the fact that there are no stairs to climb.
    On the down side, this type of house is relatively expensive to build; by comparison, a two-story house with the same exterior dimensions has twice the living area, with essentially no extra costโ“ for roof or foundation. (Roof costs for a one-story house are often minimized by using a low pitched roofline.)
    One-story houses also require a greater amount of lot space in relation to the amount of living area, so they may be inappropriate or impractical on small or narrow lots.

  11. One and One-Half Story House
    Also known as a Cape Cod, the ONE AND ONE-HALF STORY HOUSE has a steeply pitched roof that permits part of the attic area to be used for living space. Roof dormers, which add to the amount of usable upstairs space, are a common feature of this type of house. As in the case of one-story houses, the foundation may or may not include a basement. Construction costs per square foot tend to be lower for one and one-half story houses than for one-story houses.
    One and one-half story houses are often built with expandability in mind. Because the ground floor normally has at least one bedroom (and sometimes two), the upstairs level can be left unfinished until the extra space is needed. However, ease of expandability will depend on the quality of the original design and construction, which should allow for adequate access (stairs), ventilation (windows) and plumbing (bathrooms) on the attic level.

  12. Two-Story House
    Compared to a one-story or one and one-half story house, the two-story house is more economical in terms of construction cost per square foot of living space.
    The reason for the economy is that square footage can be doubled without doubling foundation and roof system costs. This design also allows for the most living space on a given size of lot. Bedrooms are normally located on the upper floor, providing a natural separation between the public and private areas of the house.
    A concern with all multi-level houses is the design and efficiency of heating and cooling systems. Because heat rises, a poorly designed system will make it difficult to keep the lower level warm in winter, and the upstairs cool in the summer.
    With a well designed system, however, heating and cooling efficiency may actually be greater than for single-story houses, since the building has less exterior surface area relative to the amount of heated or cooled interior space.

  13. Split-Level House
    A SPLIT-LEVEL HOUSE has three or four different levels, which are staggered so that each level is separated from the next by half of a flight of stairs. Bedrooms and baths are located
    217
    Chapter 7
    on the top level. Half a flight down are the main entry, living room, dining room and kitchen. Down another half-story, beneath the bedroom level, is space for a family room, den or spare bedroom; the garage is often located on this level as well. A fourth level, equivalent to a basement, may be located below the living/dining/kitchen space.
    The design of a split-level home lends itself to a sloped lot, where the garage and main entry can both open out at grade level. On a flat site, the main entry will be raised one- half story above the finished grade.
    A split-level house has some of the same benefits as a two-story house in terms of construction, cost efficiency and natural separation of the various functional areas of the home.

  14. Bi-Level House
    A BI-LEVEL or SPLIT-ENTRY HOUSE has two main levels, one atop the other, with an entry or foyer located on a level halfway between. The lower level is sunk about halfway below ground, so the entry is even with the grade level. This design is sometimes called a โ€œraised ranch,โ€ since it is essentially a one-story home with a finished basement that has been raised partially out of the ground. The main rooms of the house are all on the upper level, with the lower story used for a family room or rec room, and perhaps a spare bedroom.
    Since the lower level of a split-entry house is partly below ground, special care must be taken to provide adequate insulation and moisture proofing. Another drawback to this design is the lack of a basement or crawlspace in which to run pipes and ductwork.
    Nevertheless, split-entry homes are cost-effective to build, and the finished lower level space is considered part of the โ€œgross living areaโ€ for appraisal purposes in many parts of the country.
    II. Architectural Styles
    ARCHITECTURAL STYLE is the character of a buildingโ€™s form and ornamentation.
    If homebuyers in a particular area do not find a particular architectural style desirable, homes of that style are likely to sell for less than similar size homes having architectural styles which are more desirable within that community.
    Architectural styles have traditionally been influenced by local factors such as climate and the availability of different building materials.
    There are many examples of traditional architectural styles that are adapted to a particular location: Spanish style houses with thick adobe walls and tile roofs in the southwest desert, Southern Colonial houses with deep shaded porches in the hot, humid South, or Cape Cod style homes designed for protection from cold northern winds in New England (see Figure 7-3).
    218
    Residential Construction
    Local traditional styles can still be found in many areas, but location is much less of an influence on architectural style than it used to be.
    Builders are no longer limited to using local materials, since modern transportation systems make different building materials widely available at reasonable costs. The invention of central heating and cooling, as well as improved insulating materials, has broadened the range of architectural styles that can be adapted to local climates.

A. COMPATIBILITY
COMPATIBILITY means that a building is in harmony with its use or uses and its environment. In terms of value, one type or style of house is not inherently better or worse than any other. What is most important to value is the compatibility of the design. Compatibility has several different aspects. To maximize value, the design of a house should be compatible with the designs of other homes in the area, with the physical and environmental characteristics of the building site, with the materials used in the construction, and with the preferences of the local marketโ“.
First of all, the design of a house should be compatible with the styles of other houses in the local neighborhood.
The market may welcome a limited degree of uniqueness in design, but value will generally suffer if the design contrasts too radically with surrounding houses.
Subdivision developers often impose design restrictions on their developments, because they know that compatibility of design will have a positiveโ“ impact on property values in the subdivision.
Case/Example: A contemporary style house located in a neighborhood of other contemporary style houses is likely to be viewed positively by the market. But the same house located in a neighborhood of traditional style homes might seem โ€œout-of-place,โ€ and its value could suffer as a result.
Compatibility of design also refers to the suitability of the design for the particular building lot and location. Value is enhanced by a design that takes advantage of physical site characteristics, such as views. The design should also be appropriate for the topography of the site. For example, split-level designs often work well on hilly sites, while colonial style houses do not. Finally, the design should be appropriate for the local climate. A design that is specifically adapted to a hot desert climate, for example, would be inappropriate in an area with cool, rainy weather.
A buildingโ€™s architectural style is often defined at least in part by the materials used in its construction. Spanish style homes have clay tile roofs, Tudorโ€™s utilize timber framing, contemporary designs incorporate large areas of glass. A compatible design is one where the materials are appropriate to the style.
Case/Example: A clay tile roof on a Cape Cod house would look ridiculous to most potential homebuyers.
The final aspect of design compatibility is perhaps the most important: the design must be compatible with the demands of the market.
220
Residential Construction
The popularity of any given design is influenced by the economic and social forces that affect value. As lifestyles and demographics change, so does the demand for different design features in housing.
Ultimately, it is the local market that determines what is a โ€œgoodโ€ design, and what is a
โ€œbadโ€ one.
Case/Example: A development of new contemporary style houses is built in an older community with mostly traditional style housing. If the market places an emphasis on the historic character of the community, the contemporary homes will be viewed as incompatible, and their value will suffer. On the other hand, if market forces are creating a demand for more modern housing in the community, the contemporary homes may not be incompatible at all, but may simply represent a new trend in community standards.
III. Elements of House Design
An appraiser must be able to identify the various elements of house design and evaluate any defects in those elements. The elements of house design include siting, interior functional zones, and room characteristics.
He or she may use mobile apps to reproduce accurate renderings to use for comparison purposes.

A. SITING
SITING refers to the placement of the house on the building lot. Placement is normally limited to some extent by building code set-back requirements, which call for minimum distances between the house and the propertyโ€™s boundaries. Topographic considerations such as slopes or poor soil conditions may also limit where the house may be placed on the lot. Within these limits, however, careful placement of the house on the lot can have a significant impact on value.
There are four basic considerations in designing the placement of a house on its lot: orientation to the sun, orientation to prevailing storm winds, orientation to views, and the division of the lot into functional zones (see Figure 7-4).
Appraisers can create figures like the one above by using appropriate mobile apps.
Orientation to the sun affects the amount of light and heat that can enter the house. In most areas, a design where the living areas of the house face south is considered optimum. This orientation takes best advantage of natural lighting in the most used areas of the home, and helps maximize solar heat gain in the winter. Excessive summer heat gain can be avoided by using wide roof overhangs, which shade the house in summer when the sun is high in the sky, but allow light and heat to penetrate in the winter when the sunโ€™s path is lower.
Screening with deciduous trees is another effective way to block the summer sun but still allow it to shine through in the winter when the trees are bare.
221
Chapter 7
In some areas, orientation to prevailing storm winds is an important siting consideration. In areas that are subject to frequent or heavy storms from a particular direction, it is best to minimize the amount of window area that is directly exposed to the winds, in order to cut down on heat loss. Entries should also be sheltered from the direct path of the storms.
An attractive view can add significantly to the value of a house. Views should be visible from the most used areas of the house. Even if the site does not have an attractive territorial view, careful landscaping can provide a pleasant view of the lot from the living area.
The last aspect of house siting is the division of the lot into functional areas or zones, the so-called public, private, and service zones. The area that can be viewed from the street frontage is the public zone. Areas shielded from the street by the house, or by fencing or other landscaping, constitute the private area. The service area includes access ways (driveway, walkways, etc.) and outdoor storage areas. Good design maximizes the amount of private area available for household activities.

B. INTERIOR FUNCTIONAL ZONE
An appraiser cannot underestimate the importance of FUNCTIONAL UTILITY, which concerns a buildingโ€™s ability to perform the function for which it is intended according to current
market tastes and standards; as well as the efficiency of use in terms of architectural style, design and layout, traffic patterns, and the size and type of rooms.
A well-designed house should provide space for three basic activities: living, working, and sleeping.
Ideally, the spaces provided for each of these activities should be separated, so that one activity does not interfere with another. For example, bedrooms should be located where they will not be disturbed by activities in the living and working areas of the house.
Figure 7-5 shows how the spaces for the three different activities can be separated into zones. The LIVING ZONE includes the public areas of the house: the living room, dining room, family room and guest bath. The WORKING ZONE is comprised of the kitchen and laundry/ utility room. Bedrooms and private baths are located in the SLEEPING ZONE.

The separate activity areas of the home are connected by hallways, stairs and entry ways, which are sometimes referred to as a fourth zone of the house, the CIRCULATION ZONE. While the three activity zones should be designed to provide separation of the activities, they should also allow for easy circulation between and within zones.
Design features that affect desirability affect value because value is determined by supply and demand features of the marketplace.
222
Residential Construction
A houseโ€™s value is affected by the buildingโ€™s FLOOR PLAN, which is an architectural drawing indicating the exact layout of rooms and illustrating the functional or nonfunctional relationship between them. Structures with wasted space might lack space where it is otherwise desired so that the property will be less desirable to buyers than similar size homes.
How the designer allocates space affects desirability for many buyers. An example is while a custom 3,000 square foot home might have only two bedrooms because that is what the original owner wanted, to most potential buyers, the design would be a negative feature.
Case/Example: In a retirement oriented community, a two-story home without a bedroom on the first level is likely to be far less desirable than one with this feature.

C. ROOM CHARACTERISTICS

  1. Kitchens
    The kitchen is commonly the most used room of the house, so its design and location have a large impact on the functionality of the overall floor plan.
    Kitchens should be conveniently accessible from both the main entrance and service entrance of the house, and should be located adjacent to the dining room and family room, if these rooms are included in the design. Also, the kitchen should be designed so that it is not necessary to walk through the working area in order to reach other rooms of the house.
    A critical aspect of kitchen design is the work triangle, which is formed by the sink, refrigerator, and range. The distances between the three points of the work triangle can make the difference between an efficient kitchen design and a poor one. If the distances are too small, the kitchen will be cramped; if they are too great, preparing a meal will seem like a five-mile hike. A distance of four to seven feet between each point of the work triangle is considered optimal (see Figure 7-6).

Kitchen sizes vary considerably. Eighty square feet of space (8โ€™ x 10โ€™) is considered a minimum, but kitchens twice that size are not uncommon. Larger kitchens often include an eating area or family activity area. The design should include adequate counter and cabinet space, and plenty of electrical outlets for kitchen appliances.
Lighting and ventilation are important considerations in kitchen design. Overhead lights should illuminate all areas of the kitchen, and a vent or fan should be located over the cooking area to allow cooking fumes to escape. Natural lighting is desirable, but the placement of windows can be a problem. The best location for a kitchen window is over the sink. Additional windows are desirable so long as they do not take up space needed for wall cabinets.
Windows should never be placed over the cooking area.
223
Chapter 7

  1. Laundry/Utility Rooms
    Laundry areas are best located where they are convenient to the sleeping area of the house, off the bedroom hallway for example. However, location of the laundry area is not as critical as most other rooms of the house, and laundries are often located in the garage or basement.
    The laundry area should be well-ventilated, and located where noise from the appliances will not disturb others.

  2. Living Rooms
    The living room is the main public room of the house.
    It should be located near the main (guest) entry, be separated from the sleeping area, and preferably be on the south side of the house. If the house has a dining room, it should be next to the living room. It should not be necessary to cross through the living room in order to reach the kitchen or bedrooms.
    The size and shape of the living room should allow for easy arrangement of furniture. About 200 square feet is the minimum size, and rectangular shaped rooms tend to work best for furniture placement. The modern trend is for smaller living rooms, particularly in homes with a separate family/recreation room.

  3. Family Rooms
    In many areas, the FAMILY ROOM (also called a recreation room) has taken over the role of the living room as the main center of entertainment and socializing in the house. As part of the living zone, the family room should be separated from the sleeping zone; however, it is usually considered an advantage if the family room is next to (or near) the kitchen.
    Since the family room is a center of activity for household members, direct access to the outside is also an asset.
    224
    Residential Construction

  4. Dining Rooms
    Dining rooms may be formal or informal. A formal dining room or area is a separate room that is designed for that purpose. Informal dining areas are usually attached to or part of the kitchen itself, and may take the form of a nook or alcove.
    The main considerations for the dining area are that it should be large enough to accommodate a dining table and chairs (including room to get in and out of the table), and it should have easy access to the kitchen so that food does not have to be carried through other areas of the house.

  5. Bedrooms
    The number of bedrooms has a major effect on house value.
    Normally, homes with different numbers of bedrooms appeal to different segments of the market, that is, to families of different sizes or lifestyles. The average household size in the market will have a large impact on the desirability of three- or four-bedroom homes, as opposed to two-bedroom homes.
    Ideally, bedrooms should all be located in a separate sleeping zone, to provide both privacy and noise insulation. The most common arrangement is to locate the bedrooms on a separate story or wing. Each bedroom should have convenient access to a bathroom, either directly or via a private hallway. Also, it should not be necessary to go through a bedroom to reach another room (other than a private bath).
    Depending on the room layout, a size of 9โ€™ x 10โ€™ is the minimum needed to allow for a single bed, 10โ€™ x 12โ€™ for a double bed. Whether larger room sizes will add to value depends on local market preferences. Most homes have at least one bedroom that is larger than the others, the MASTER BEDROOM. Modern master bedrooms will often have walk-in closets and other amenities.
    Each bedroom should have its own close
    The โ€œSite Valuation Methods: Applying Cost, Sales, and Income Approachesโ€ chapter within the โ€œMastering Appraisal Adjustmentsโ€ training course equips participants with the skills to accurately value land by outlining and explaining the scientific underpinnings of three key approaches: cost, sales comparison, and income. This directly addresses the course description’s focus on analyzing property rights and identifying influencing factors for precise valuations.

The chapter clarifies that a separate site valuation is crucial for certain valuation techniques (cost approach and building residual technique in income capitalization), legal requirements (property tax and condemnation), and the overall appraisal process. It emphasizes the need to understand legal descriptions to accurately determine property boundaries, aligning with the course’s goal of mastering complex scenarios.

The cost approach hinges on the principle that property value is the sum of the site value, new construction costs, minus depreciation, requiring an accurate site valuation as the starting point. Accurately estimating depreciation, accounting for physical and functional obsolescence, is highlighted as essential for determining market valueโ“ using this approach.

The sales comparison approachโ“, also known as the market approach, emphasizes the importance of identifying comparable properties and making appropriate adjustments. Accurately adjusting the sales prices of comparable properties based on key differences (e.g., number of bathrooms, site size) is critical for reliably indicating market value, directly correlating with the course description’s focus on analyzing financingโ“ nuances, sale conditions, and location variations. The use of proper adjustments is the key to correctly valuing a property using the sales comparison approach, and understanding the characteristics of the properties being compared is vital to making proper adjustments.

The income approach focuses on a property’s income-generating potential, assuming that greater income translates to higher value. It introduces the concept of Gross Rent Multipliers (GRM) for residential appraisals, demonstrating how to derive and apply appropriate GRMs to the subject propertyโ€™s gross monthly income to determine value.

The chapter addresses reconciliation which involves reviewing data reliability, logical analysis, and value indicators. The summary emphasizes that it is not a simple averaging of the three approaches, but requires the appraiserโ€™s judgment to weigh each approach based on the specific appraisal problem and relevant market data. Understanding when the sales comparison approach is most reliable, versus the income approach, is a key course objective that the reconciliation portion drives home.

In conclusion, the chapter provides the theoretical foundation and practical methodologies required to estimate site value, aligning with the “Mastering Appraisal Adjustments” course’s objective of enhancing expertise in real estate appraisal and mastering the sales comparison approach, and accurately determining market value.

Explanation:

-:

No videos available for this chapter.

Are you ready to test your knowledge?

Google Schooler Resources: Exploring Academic Links

...

Scientific Tags and Keywords: Deep Dive into Research Areas