Login or Create a New Account

Sign in easily with your Google account.

هل أعجبك ما رأيت؟ سجل الدخول لتجربة المزيد!

Site Valuation Techniques

Site Valuation Techniques

Decoding Home Construction: From Foundation to Finishes - Chapter: Site Valuation Techniques

Introduction

Within the multifaceted realm of residential construction and real estate appraisal, accurate site valuation constitutes a foundational pillar for informed decision-making. This chapter, “Site Valuation Techniques,” forms a critical component of “Decoding Home Construction: From Foundation to Finishes,” bridging the gap between understanding building components and assessing their ultimate market value. As outlined in the course description, this training program equips participants with the essential knowledge to evaluate construction quality, understand building components, and effectively compare construction costs. Site valuation, as a discrete but interconnected process, is essential for property appraisals, as is required for legal requirements for property tax assessment.

The rationale for independent site valuation lies in its pivotal role within established appraisal methodologies. The cost approach to value, a cornerstone of property assessment, necessitates a separate estimation of site value to determine the replacement cost of improvements less depreciation. Similarly, the building residual technique within income capitalization demands precise land valuation for accurate income forecasting and property valuation. Furthermore, legal mandates often require distinct site valuations, particularly in scenarios involving property tax assessments and eminent domain proceedings.

From a scientific perspective, site valuation requires a rigorous application of economic principles, geographical analysis, and market dynamics. The characteristics of the site influence the value of the property. The core principles of supply and demand, utility, scarcity, and transferability are intricately intertwined, influencing the perceived worth of a parcel of land. Topographical attributes, location relative to infrastructure and amenities, zoning regulations, and environmental considerations all contribute to the complex interplay of factors that determine site value.

This chapter aims to provide a comprehensive and practical understanding of various site valuation techniques. Upon completion, participants will be able to:

  1. Understand the fundamental principles driving site value, including the concept of highest and best use (as if vacant), and how it relates to current market conditions.
  2. Apply different methods for determining site value, including sales comparison, allocation, extraction, development cost, land residual, and ground rent capitalization.
  3. Critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each method, considering their applicability to various scenarios and market conditions.
  4. Successfully integrate site valuation techniques into broader appraisal processes, such as the cost approach and income capitalization models.

By mastering these techniques, participants will gain the necessary skills to analyze sites independently, assess the impact of land value on overall property worth, and contribute meaningfully to informed decision-making in the residential construction and real estate appraisal sectors. Ultimately, this chapter seeks to deconstruct the often-opaque world of site valuation, providing a scientific and precise framework for understanding the underlying drivers of value in residential property.

Chapter: Site Valuation Techniques

Part of Training Course: Decoding Home Construction: From Foundation to Finishes

Description:

This chapter delves into the scientific principles and practical applications of site valuation techniques. It explores the fundamental theories, methods, and mathematical formulas used by appraisers to determine the value of a site independent of any improvements. Understanding these techniques is crucial for cost approach analysis, income capitalization, property tax assessment, and making informed decisions in real estate, appraisal, or homeownership.

6.1 Introduction: The Importance of Site Valuation

In the world of real estate appraisal, a “site” is more than just land; it’s land prepared for a specific purpose, typically through clearing, grading, and the provision of utilities. The value of this site is a cornerstone in several valuation methodologies. Specifically, a separate site valuation provides crucial data in both cost approach and the building residual technique of income capitalization.
Moreover, a distinct site valuation is mandated by law for property tax assessments and eminent domain valuations. These legal requirements underscore the necessity for appraisers to be proficient in accurately determining a site’s value.

6.2 The Concept of Highest and Best Use

The bedrock of any site valuation is the principle of Highest and Best Use (HBU). This represents the use that is:

  1. Legally Permissible: Compliant with zoning laws, building codes, and environmental regulations.
  2. Physically Possible: Feasible given the site’s size, shape, topography, and soil conditions.
  3. Economically Feasible: Yielding a positive return on investment, considering development costs and market demand.
  4. Maximally Productive: Generating the highest present value for the site.

Determining the HBU of a site, both as if vacant and as improved, is a critical first step in the valuation process. If it were to change, it could drastically alter all valuation calculations.

6.3 Site Valuation Methods: A Comprehensive Overview

This section will review the primary methodologies employed in site valuation, providing a scientific foundation for each.

6.3.1 The Sales Comparison Approach: Grounded in Market Data

The Sales Comparison Approach (also known as the market data approach) is the most widely used and preferred method. It relies on analyzing the sale prices of comparable vacant sites and sales of improved properties similar to the subject property in the market.

  • Theoretical Basis: This approach adheres to the principle of substitution, which states that a rational buyer will pay no more for a property than the cost of acquiring a comparable substitute.
  • Scientific Principles: The approach requires meticulous data collection and analysis to ensure accurate comparisons.
  • Identifying Comparables: Key characteristics to consider when identifying comparables include:

    • Location: Proximity to amenities, transportation, and employment centers.
    • Zoning: Permitted uses and development restrictions.
    • Size and Shape: Conformance to typical lot sizes and shapes in the area.
    • Topography and Soil Conditions: Suitability for construction.
    • Availability of Utilities: Access to water, sewer, electricity, and gas.
  • Elements of Comparison: These are the aspects in which the comparable properties can differ from the subject property.

    • Real Property Rights Conveyed
    • Financing Terms
    • Conditions of Sale
    • Expenditures Immediately After Sale
    • Market Conditions Adjustment
    • Location Adjustments
    • Physical Characteristics
    • Economic Characteristics
    • Adjustment Process: The sales prices of the comparable properties are adjusted to account for any differences between them and the subject property. These adjustments can be quantitative (e.g., dollar amounts) or qualitative (e.g., ratings of “superior” or “inferior”).
    • Equation:
      Subject Value = Comparable Sales Price +/- Adjustments

6.3.2 The Allocation Method: A Ratio-Based Approach

The Allocation Method is used to estimate site value by allocating a percentage of the overall property value to the land.

  • Theoretical Basis: This method assumes that there’s a typical ratio between land value and overall property value for similar properties in the market.
  • Scientific Principles: It relies on market data to establish the typical land-to-value ratio.
  • Mathematical Formulation:

    • Site Value = Property Value * Allocation Ratio
    • Example: if the Ratio is 25% for the land, and Property Value is \$100,000, the Site Value = \$100,000 * 0.25 = \$25,000

6.3.3 The Extraction Method: Isolating Land Value

The Extraction Method estimates site value by subtracting the depreciated cost of improvements from the total property value.
* Theoretical Basis: It acknowledges that the overall property value is composed of the land value plus the value contributed by the improvements.
* Scientific Principles: It requires accurate estimation of both the total property value and the depreciated cost of the improvements.
* Mathematical Formulation:

*   `Site Value = Property Value - Depreciated Cost of Improvements`
  • Depreciation Estimation: Depreciation, which measures the difference in value between the cost (new) of the improvements and their current value, can be due to:

    • Physical deterioration
    • Functional obsolescence
    • External obsolescence
    • Example: Property value is estimated to be $300,000, and the estimated depreciated cost of the building on the lot is $100,000. Then the Site Value = $300,000 - $100,000 = $200,000.

6.3.4 The Development Method: Projecting Future Value

The Development Method (also known as the subdivision development method) is used to value raw land by analyzing its potential for subdivision and development.

  • Theoretical Basis: The value of raw land is derived from the present value of its future development potential. This method incorporates the principle of anticipation.
  • Scientific Principles: It requires a detailed feasibility study, including cost estimations, market analysis, and cash flow projections.
  • Mathematical Formulation:
    • Present Value of Land = (Projected Revenue from Developed Lots - Total Development Costs) / (1 + Discount Rate)^n
      • Where “n” is the project’s time horizon (in years)

6.3.5 The Land Residual Method: Isolating Land’s Income Contribution

The Land Residual Method is a form of the income capitalization approach used to determine the value of a property’s land. This method involves calculating the net operating income (NOI) attributable to the land and then capitalizing that income.

  • Theoretical Basis: It assumes that the total NOI is divided between the land and the building and that the land’s value is directly related to the income it generates.
  • Scientific Principles: Requires accurately estimating overall NOI, improvement capitalization rate, and the value of improvements.
  • Mathematical Formulation:
    1. Calculate Income Attributable to Improvements: Building Value * Building Capitalization Rate.
    2. Calculate Income Attributable to Land: Property NOI – Income Attributable to Improvements
    3. Calculate Land Value: Income Attributable to Land / Land Capitalization Rate
  • Equation:
    Property Value of Site = (NOI - Building Value * Capitalization Rate) / Land Capitalization Rate

6.3.6 The Ground Rent Capitalization Method: Capitalizing Ground Lease Payments

The Ground Rent Capitalization Method is a valuation technique used when the land is subject to a ground lease.

  • Theoretical Basis: Land value is derived by capitalizing the annual ground rent paid under the lease.
  • Scientific Principles: Requires accurate data on ground rents and market-derived capitalization rates.
  • Mathematical Formulation:
    • Land Value = Ground Rent / Capitalization Rate

6.4 Special Considerations

  • Excess Land and Surplus Land: Properly accounting for excess land, which has value, and surplus land is important to accurately calculate the value of the subject property.
  • Plottage Value: Recognizing potential plottage value, which could increase the overall value of two or more land parcels.
  • Interim Use Considerations: Understanding how interim land usage affect value.

6.5 Conclusion

Proficiency in site valuation techniques is essential for any real estate appraiser. This chapter has provided a scientific overview of the various methods used to determine site value, emphasizing their underlying principles, mathematical formulations, and practical applications. By mastering these techniques, appraisers can make well-informed judgments, ensuring accurate and reliable property valuations.

Chapter Summary

  1. list the three basic activity zones of a house and describe their relationships to each other;
  2. describe the characteristics that affect functional utility in the various rooms of a house,
  3. identify the characteristics of various building components that can affect value, and
  4. understand the technical terminology used to describe residential construction.
       I. Classification of Houses
       Houses are generally classified on the basis of four characteristics: the number of units, whether the building is attached or detached, the number of stories and the architectural style.
       The NUMBER OF UNITS refers to the number of separate households that the building is designed to accommodate. Although usage may vary in different areas, the term “house” is most often used to refer to a SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE. If a building has multiple units that share a common access and other common areas, it is usually referred to as an APARTMENT BUILDING.
       A DETACHED HOUSE is one that is not connected to any other <a data-bs-toggle="modal" data-bs-target="#questionModal-370148" role="button" aria-label="Open Question" class="keyword-wrapper question-trigger"><span class="keyword-container"><a data-bs-toggle="modal" data-bs-target="#questionModal-370155" role="button" aria-label="Open Question" class="keyword-wrapper question-trigger"><span class="keyword-container">property</span><span class="flag-trigger">❓</span></a></span><span class="flag-trigger">❓</span></a>. ATTACHED HOUSES share one or more walls, called “party walls,” that are jointly owned by the two adjoining properties. ROW HOUSES, common in many urban areas, are an example of attached dwellings. Ownership of an attached dwelling often involves a PARTY WALL AGREEMENT, which assigns responsibility for maintenance and repair of the party wall(s) (see Figure 7-1).
       A. TYPES OF HOUSES
       The “type of house” refers to the number of stories or levels in the house, and their relationship to each other.
       Although modern construction methods allow for all sorts of variations, the vast majority of houses fall into five basic “type” categories (see Figure 7-2):
       1. one-story,
       2. one and one-half story,
       3. two-story,
       4. split-level, and
       5. bi-level (also known as split-entry or raised ranch).
    
       1. One-Story House
       A ONE-STORY HOUSE, often called a “ranch” or “rambler,” has its entire living area on the ground floor. It may or may not have a BASEMENT, which is a room of full story height located below the first floor, at least partially below ground level, and primarily not used for living accommodations.
       The advantages of one-story houses include: ease of exterior maintenance, flexibility of floor plan design and the fact that there are no stairs to climb.
       On the down side, this type of house is relatively expensive to build; by comparison, a two-story house with the same exterior dimensions has twice the living area, with essentially no extra cost for roof or foundation. (Roof costs for a one-story house are often minimized by using a low pitched roofline.)
       One-story houses also require a greater amount of lot space in relation to the amount of living area, so they may be inappropriate or impractical on small or narrow lots.
    
       2. One and One-Half Story House
       Also known as a Cape Cod, the ONE AND ONE-HALF STORY HOUSE has a steeply pitched roof that permits part of the attic area to be used for living space. Roof dormers, which add to the amount of usable upstairs space, are a common feature of this type of house. As in the case of one-story houses, the foundation may or may not include a basement. Construction costs per square foot tend to be lower for one and one-half story houses than for one-story houses.
       One and one-half story houses are often built with expandability in mind. Because the ground floor normally has at least one bedroom (and sometimes two), the upstairs level can be left unfinished until the extra space is needed. However, ease of expandability will depend on the quality of the original design and construction, which should allow for adequate access (stairs), ventilation (windows) and plumbing (bathrooms) on the attic level.
    
       3. Two-Story House
       Compared to a one-story or one and one-half story house, the two-story house is more economical in terms of construction cost per square foot of living space.
       The reason for the economy is that square footage can be doubled without doubling foundation and roof system costs. This design also allows for the most living space on a given size of lot. Bedrooms are normally located on the upper floor, providing a natural separation between the public and private areas of the house.
       A concern with all multi-level houses is the design and efficiency of heating and cooling systems. Because heat rises, a poorly designed system will <a data-bs-toggle="modal" data-bs-target="#questionModal-370157" role="button" aria-label="Open Question" class="keyword-wrapper question-trigger"><span class="keyword-container">make</span><span class="flag-trigger">❓</span></a> it difficult to keep the lower level warm in winter, and the upstairs cool in the summer.
       With a well designed system, however, heating and cooling efficiency may actually be greater than for single-story houses, since the building has less exterior surface area relative to the amount of heated or cooled interior space.
    
       4. Split-Level House
       A SPLIT-LEVEL HOUSE has three or four different levels, which are staggered so that each level is separated from the next by half of a flight of stairs. Bedrooms and baths are located on the top level. Half a flight down are the main entry, living room, dining room and kitchen. Down another half-story, beneath the bedroom level, is space for a family room, den or spare bedroom; the garage is often located on this level as well. A fourth level, equivalent to a basement, may be located below the living/dining/kitchen space.
       The design of a split-level home lends itself to a sloped lot, where the garage and main entry can both open out at grade level. On a flat site, the main entry will be raised one- half story above the finished grade.
       A split-level house has some of the same benefits as a two-story house in terms of construction, cost efficiency and natural separation of the various functional areas of the home.
    
       5. Bi-Level House
       A BI-LEVEL or SPLIT-ENTRY HOUSE has two main levels, one atop the other, with an entry or foyer located on a level halfway between. The lower level is sunk about halfway below ground, so the entry is even with the grade level. This design is sometimes called a “raised ranch,” since it is essentially a one-story home with a finished basement that has been raised partially out of the ground. The main rooms of the house are all on the upper level, with the lower story used for a family room or rec room, and perhaps a spare bedroom.
       Since the lower level of a split-entry house is partly below ground, special care must be taken to provide adequate insulation and moisture proofing. Another drawback to this design is the lack of a basement or crawlspace in which to run pipes and ductwork.
       Nevertheless, split-entry homes are cost-effective to build, and the finished lower level space is considered part of the “gross living area” for appraisal purposes in many parts of the country.
    
       II. Architectural Styles
       ARCHITECTURAL STYLE is the character of a building’s form and ornamentation.
       If homebuyers in a particular area do not find a particular architectural style desirable, homes of that style are likely to sell for less than similar size homes having architectural styles which are more desirable within that community.
       Architectural styles have traditionally been influenced by local factors such as climate and the availability of different building materials.
       There are many examples of traditional architectural styles that are adapted to a particular location: Spanish style houses with thick adobe walls and tile roofs in the southwest desert, Southern Colonial houses with deep shaded porches in the hot, humid South, or Cape Cod style homes designed for protection from cold northern winds in New England (see Figure 7-3).
       Local traditional styles can still be found in many areas, but location is much less of an influence on architectural style than it used to be.
       Builders are no longer limited to using local materials, since modern transportation systems make different building materials widely available at reasonable costs. The invention of central heating and cooling, as well as improved insulating materials, has broadened the range of architectural styles that can be adapted to local climates.
    
       A. COMPATIBILITY
       COMPATIBILITY means that a building is in harmony with its use or uses and its environment. In terms of value, one type or style of house is not inherently better or worse than any other. What is most important to value is the compatibility of the design. Compatibility has several different aspects. To maximize value, the design of a house should be compatible with the designs of other homes in the area, with the <a data-bs-toggle="modal" data-bs-target="#questionModal-370144" role="button" aria-label="Open Question" class="keyword-wrapper question-trigger"><span class="keyword-container">physical</span><span class="flag-trigger">❓</span></a> and environmental characteristics of the building site, with the materials used in the construction, and with the preferences of the local market.
       First of all, the design of a house should be compatible with the styles of other houses in the local neighborhood.
       The market may welcome a limited degree of uniqueness in design, but value will generally suffer if the design contrasts too radically with surrounding houses.
       Subdivision developers often impose design restrictions on their developments, because they know that compatibility of design will have a positive impact on property values in the subdivision.
       Case/Example: A contemporary style house located in a neighborhood of other contemporary style houses is likely to be viewed positively by the market. But the same house located in a neighborhood of traditional style homes might seem “out-of-place,” and its value could suffer as a result.
       Compatibility of design also refers to the suitability of the design for the particular building lot and location. Value is enhanced by a design that takes advantage of physical site characteristics, such as views. The design should also be appropriate for the topography of the site. For example, split-level designs often work well on hilly sites, while colonial style houses do not. Finally, the design should be appropriate for the local climate. A design that is specifically adapted to a hot desert climate, for example, would be inappropriate in an area with cool, rainy weather.
       A building’s architectural style is often defined at least in part by the materials used in its construction. Spanish style homes have clay tile roofs, Tudor’s utilize timber framing, contemporary designs incorporate large areas of glass. A compatible design is one where the materials are appropriate to the style.
       Case/Example: A clay tile roof on a Cape Cod house would look ridiculous to most potential homebuyers.
       The final aspect of design compatibility is perhaps the most important: the design must be compatible with the demands of the market.
       The popularity of any given design is influenced by the economic and social forces that affect value. As lifestyles and demographics change, so does the demand for different design features in housing.
       Ultimately, it is the local market that <a data-bs-toggle="modal" data-bs-target="#questionModal-370146" role="button" aria-label="Open Question" class="keyword-wrapper question-trigger"><span class="keyword-container">determines</span><span class="flag-trigger">❓</span></a> what is a “good” design, and what is a
       “bad” one.
       Case/Example: A development of new contemporary style houses is built in an older community with mostly traditional style housing. If the market places an emphasis on the historic character of the community, the contemporary homes will be viewed as incompatible, and their value will suffer. On the other hand, if market forces are creating a demand for more modern housing in the community, the contemporary homes may not be incompatible at all, but may simply represent a new trend in community standards.
    
       III. Elements of House Design
       An appraiser must be able to identify the various elements of house design and evaluate any defects in those elements. The elements of house design include siting, interior functional zones, and room characteristics.
       He or she may use mobile apps to reproduce accurate renderings to use for comparison purposes.
    
       A. SITING
       SITING refers to the placement of the house on the building lot. Placement is normally limited to some extent by building code set-back requirements, which call for minimum distances between the house and the property’s boundaries. Topographic considerations such as slopes or poor soil conditions may also limit where the house may be placed on the lot. Within these limits, however, careful placement of the house on the lot can have a significant impact on value.
       There are four basic considerations in designing the placement of a house on its lot: orientation to the sun, orientation to prevailing storm winds, orientation to views, and the division of the lot into functional zones (see Figure 7-4).
       Appraisers can create figures like the one above by using appropriate mobile apps.
       Orientation to the sun affects the amount of light and heat that can enter the house. In most areas, a design where the living areas of the house face south is considered optimum. This orientation takes best advantage of natural lighting in the most used areas of the home, and helps maximize solar heat gain in the winter. Excessive summer heat gain can be avoided by using wide roof overhangs, which shade the house in summer when the sun is high in the sky, but allow light and heat to penetrate in the winter when the sun’s path is lower.
       Screening with deciduous trees is another effective way to block the summer sun but still allow it to shine through in the winter when the trees are bare.
       In some areas, orientation to prevailing storm winds is an important siting consideration. In areas that are subject to frequent or heavy storms from a particular direction, it is best to minimize the amount of window area that is directly exposed to the winds, in order to cut down on heat loss. Entries should also be sheltered from the direct path of the storms.
       An attractive view can add significantly to the value of a house. Views should be visible from the most used areas of the house. Even if the site does not have an attractive territorial view, careful landscaping can provide a pleasant view of the lot from the living area.
       The last aspect of house siting is the division of the lot into functional areas or zones, the so-called public, private, and service zones. The area that can be viewed from the street frontage is the public zone. Areas shielded from the street by the house, or by fencing or other landscaping, constitute the private area. The service area includes access ways (driveway, walkways, etc.) and outdoor storage areas. Good design maximizes the amount of private area available for household activities.
    
       B. INTERIOR FUNCTIONAL ZONE
       An appraiser cannot underestimate the importance of FUNCTIONAL UTILITY, which concerns a building’s ability to perform the function for which it is intended according to current market tastes and standards; as well as the efficiency of use in terms of architectural style, design and layout, traffic patterns, and the size and type of rooms.
       A well-designed house should provide space for three basic activities: living, working, and sleeping.
       Ideally, the spaces provided for each of these activities should be separated, so that one activity does not interfere with another. For example, bedrooms should be located where they will not be disturbed by activities in the living and working areas of the house.
       Figure 7-5 shows how the spaces for the three different activities can be separated into zones. The LIVING ZONE includes the public areas of the house: the living room, dining room, family room and guest bath. The WORKING ZONE is comprised of the kitchen and laundry/ utility room. Bedrooms and private baths are located in the SLEEPING ZONE.
       The separate activity areas of the home are connected by hallways, stairs and entry ways, which are sometimes referred to as a fourth zone of the house, the CIRCULATION ZONE. While the three activity zones should be designed to provide separation of the activities, they should also allow for easy circulation between and within zones.
       Design features that affect desirability affect value because value is determined by supply and demand features of the marketplace.
       A house’s value is affected by the building’s FLOOR PLAN, which is an architectural drawing indicating the exact layout of rooms and illustrating the functional or nonfunctional relationship between them. Structures with wasted space might lack space where it is otherwise desired so that the property will be less desirable to buyers than similar size homes.
       How the designer allocates space affects desirability for many buyers. An example is while a custom 3,000 square foot home might have only two bedrooms because that is what the original owner wanted, to most potential buyers, the design would be a negative feature.
       Case/Example: In a retirement oriented community, a two-story home without a bedroom on the first level is likely to be far less desirable than one with this feature.
    
       C. ROOM CHARACTERISTICS
       1. Kitchens
       The kitchen is commonly the most used room of the house, so its design and location have a large impact on the functionality of the overall floor plan.
       Kitchens should be conveniently accessible from both the main entrance and service entrance of the house, and should be located adjacent to the dining room and family room, if these rooms are included in the design. Also, the kitchen should be designed so that it is not necessary to walk through the working area in order to reach other rooms of the house.
       A critical aspect of kitchen design is the work triangle, which is formed by the sink, refrigerator, and range. The distances between the three points of the work triangle can make the difference between an efficient kitchen design and a poor one. If the distances are too small, the kitchen will be cramped; if they are too great, preparing a meal will seem like a five-mile hike. A distance of four to seven feet between each point of the work triangle is considered optimal (see Figure 7-6).
       Kitchen sizes vary considerably. Eighty square feet of space (8’ x 10’) is considered a minimum, but kitchens twice that size are not uncommon. Larger kitchens often include an eating area or family activity area. The design should include adequate counter and cabinet space, and plenty of electrical outlets for kitchen appliances.
       Lighting and ventilation are important considerations in kitchen design. Overhead lights should illuminate all areas of the kitchen, and a vent or fan should be located over the cooking area to allow cooking fumes to escape. Natural lighting is desirable, but the placement of windows can be a problem. The best location for a kitchen window is over the sink. Additional windows are desirable so long as they do not take up space needed for wall cabinets.
       Windows should never be placed over the cooking area.
    
       2. Laundry/Utility Rooms
       Laundry areas are best located where they are convenient to the sleeping area of the house, off the bedroom hallway for example. However, location of the laundry area is not as critical as most other rooms of the house, and laundries are often located in the garage or basement.
       The laundry area should be well-ventilated, and located where noise from the appliances will not disturb others.
    
       3. Living Rooms
       The living room is the main public room of the house.
       It should be located near the main (guest) entry, be separated from the sleeping area, and preferably be on the south side of the house. If the house has a dining room, it should be next to the living room. It should not be necessary to cross through the living room in order to reach the kitchen or bedrooms.
       The size and shape of the living room should allow for easy arrangement of furniture. About 200 square feet is the minimum size, and rectangular shaped rooms tend to work best for furniture placement. The modern trend is for smaller living rooms, particularly in homes with a separate family/recreation room.
    
       4. Family Rooms
       In many areas, the FAMILY ROOM (also called a recreation room) has taken over the role of the living room as the main center of entertainment and socializing in the house. As part of the living zone, the family room should be separated from the sleeping zone; however, it is usually considered an advantage if the family room is next to (or near) the kitchen.
       Since the family room is a center of activity for household members, direct access to the outside is also an asset.
    
       5. Dining Rooms
       Dining rooms may be formal or informal. A formal dining room or area is a separate room that is designed for that purpose. Informal dining areas are usually attached to or part of the kitchen itself, and may take the form of a nook or alcove.
       The main considerations for the dining area are that it should be large enough to accommodate a dining table and chairs (including room to get in and out of the table), and it should have easy access to the kitchen so that food does not have to be carried through other areas of the house.
    
       6. Bedrooms
       The number of bedrooms has a major effect on house value.
       Normally, homes with different numbers of bedrooms appeal to different segments of the market, that is, to families of different sizes or lifestyles. The average household size in the market will have a large impact on the desirability of three- or four-bedroom homes, as opposed to two-bedroom homes.
       Ideally, bedrooms should all be located in a separate sleeping zone, to provide both privacy and noise insulation. The most common arrangement is to locate the bedrooms on a separate story or wing. Each bedroom should have convenient access to a bathroom, either directly or via a private hallway. Also, it should not be necessary to go through a bedroom to reach another room (other than a private bath).
       Depending on the room layout, a size of 9’ x 10’ is the minimum needed to allow for a single bed, 10’ x 12’ for a double bed. Whether larger room sizes will add to value depends on local market preferences. Most homes have at least one bedroom that is larger than the others, the MASTER BEDROOM. Modern master bedrooms will often have walk-in closets and other amenities.
       Each bedroom should have its own clo
       Do not use Markdown formatting.
    

No videos available for this chapter.

Are you ready to test your knowledge?