Applying the Three Approaches to Value

Okay, here’s a detailed scientific introduction for your chapter, designed to be precise and tailored to your course description and book content:
Chapter: Applying the Three Approaches to Value
Introduction
This chapter, “Applying the Three Approaches to Value,” builds upon the foundational principles of site and building analysis developed in preceding modules of “Property Appraisal Essentials: Site and Building Analysis.” The course systematically equips property appraisers to evaluate and value properties and make informed appraisal decisions. This chapter constitutes a critical step in that process: moving from the quantitative and qualitative assessment of site and structure towards the synthesis of those analyses into a coherent value opinion. This transition demands a rigorous application of three distinct yet interrelated valuation methodologies: the cost approach, the sales comparison approach, and the income approach.
The scientific rationale for employing these three approaches stems from the inherent complexity of real estate valuation. No single method can fully capture all the factors influencing a property’s market worth. The cost approach, predicated on the principle of substitution, posits that a rational buyer will pay no more for a property than the cost to construct an equivalent substitute, adjusted for depreciation. Accurately estimating the site value in this approach is of paramount importance, as this constitutes a fundamental building block in determining the overall property value. Given that site value is not determined through the cost approach, but rather from external factors from various different comparable sources, the accuracy of this approach hinges on the accuracy of external comparable sales analysis and subsequent application.
The sales comparison approach, conversely, relies on empirical market data, extracting value indications from recent sales of comparable properties. This approach mirrors the behaviors of actual market participants, reflecting current supply and demand dynamics, and thus necessitates a deep understanding of neighborhood characteristics, property adjustments, and market trends. As the course description notes, assessing properties requires consideration of lot shape, view impact, zoning regulations, highest and best use, utilities, flood zones, and building data collection. The validity of this approach rests on the ability to identify genuinely comparable sales and to make defensible adjustments for dissimilarities between the subject property and these comparables.
The income approach, primarily applicable to income-producing properties, operates on the principle that value is a function of future economic benefits. Using direct capitalization techniques, this approach converts anticipated income streams into a present value estimate, directly connecting profitability with market worth. Residential appraisers would need to master gross rent multiplier to determine value by the income approach.
This chapter aims to equip the student with the necessary theoretical knowledge and practical skills to:
- Competently execute each of the three valuation approaches, integrating site and building analysis data collected earlier in the course.
- Understand the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, and to identify situations where one approach may be more applicable or reliable than others.
- Address the challenges of estimating depreciation within the cost approach, given its reliance on subjective assessments of physical deterioration and functional obsolescence.
- Apply suitable adjustments within the sales comparison approach to account for financing terms, property rights, market conditions and other relevant variables.
- Employ direct capitalization within the income approach, recognizing its limitations in reflecting nuanced financial data of properties.
By mastering the application of these three approaches, students will gain the expertise needed to critically evaluate properties and provide supportable, well-reasoned value opinions, essential for effective appraisal practice. In order to reach and accurately determine the best value opinions, all approaches of valuation will be considered.
Here’s a detailed chapter outline, written in scientific English, for your “Property Appraisal Essentials” training course, specifically focusing on “Applying the Three Approaches to Value” and integrating it with the course and book content.
Chapter 7: Applying the Three Approaches to Value
Introduction
This chapter delves into the practical application of the three fundamental approaches to value: the Cost Approach, the Sales Comparison Approach, and the Income Approach. We will examine the theoretical underpinnings of each method, explore their interrelation, and learn how to effectively apply them in the context of property appraisal, building upon the site and building analysis skills detailed in previous chapters. Understanding the scientific principles behind each approach is paramount for accurate and defensible value conclusions. This chapter also emphasizes the importance of property characteristics (lot shape, view impact, zoning, etc.), and site analysis in relation to each of the three approaches to value.
1. The Cost Approach: Estimating Value from a Supply-Side Perspective
-
- Theoretical Basis: The Principle of Substitution and Opportunity Cost
- The cost approach is rooted in the principle of substitution. It posits that a rational buyer will pay no more for a property than the cost of acquiring an equivalent substitute. This substitute entails purchasing the land and constructing a new improvement.
- This approach is also tied to opportunity cost. The cost of building new represents the best alternative use for capital, setting an upper limit on the subject property’s value.
-
- Formulaic Representation and Variable Definitions:
- The core formula for the Cost Approach is:
Property Value = Land Value + Reproduction/Replacement Cost – Accrued Depreciation
Land Value
: Estimated value of the site as if vacant and available for its highest and best use (refer to Chapter 6 for site valuation techniques). Site characteristics are critical here (lot size, zoning, flood zone, etc.).Reproduction Cost
: Cost of creating an exact replica of the subject property, using the same materials, design❓, and construction methods.Replacement Cost
: Cost of constructing a functionally equivalent improvement using modern materials, design, and construction techniques.Accrued Depreciation
: The total loss in value from all causes (physical deterioration, functional obsolescence, and external obsolescence).
-
- Depreciation: A Detailed Examination of Value Loss
-
Depreciation represents the difference between the cost new of an improvement and its current market value. It arises from three primary sources:
- Physical Deterioration: Loss in value due to wear and tear, deferred maintenance, and the effects of aging. It may be curable (e.g., painting, roof repair) or incurable (e.g., structural aging).
- Functional Obsolescence: Loss in value due to deficiencies or superadequacies in the design or function of the improvement relative to current market standards (e.g., outdated floor plan, inadequate electrical capacity). This can be curable (remodeling a kitchen) or incurable (high ceilings not demanded in the market).
- External Obsolescence: Loss in value due to factors external to the property itself (e.g., proximity to a polluting factory, neighborhood decline). This is generally considered incurable by the property owner.
-
- Practical Application and Related Experiments
-
Cost Estimation Methods:
- Quantity Survey Method: Detailed inventory of all materials and labor required to construct the improvement. Most accurate but time-consuming.
- Unit-in-Place Method: Cost estimation based on the cost of installed building components (e.g., cost per square foot of installed drywall).
-
Comparative Unit Method: Cost estimation based on the cost per square foot or cubic foot of similar structures. Simplest but least accurate.
- Depreciation Estimation Techniques:
-
Age-Life Method: Depreciation is estimated based on the ratio of the effective age of the improvement to its total economic life.
Depreciation = (Effective Age / Economic Life) * Reproduction Cost
. Effective age can be different from actual age due to renovations, quality of construction, etc. - Breakdown Method: Depreciation is estimated by separately quantifying physical deterioration, functional obsolescence, and external obsolescence.
- Experiment: Given a set of building plans, materials lists, and local labor rates, estimate the reproduction cost using the quantity survey method. Compare this estimate to a cost estimate generated using the comparative unit method. Analyze the differences and discuss potential sources of error.
-
- Relationship to Course Description
- The Cost Approach is essential for assessing the impact of building data collection (as described in the course description) on property value. Building data collection feeds into the cost estimation and depreciation analysis processes. Understanding site analysis and building data collection, as described in the course description, allows for more accurate depreciation estimates.
2. The Sales Comparison Approach: Leveraging Market Data to Estimate Value
-
- Theoretical Basis: The Principle of Substitution and Market Efficiency
- The Sales Comparison Approach directly applies the principle of substitution. A buyer will pay no more for a property than they would pay for a comparable property in the marketplace.
- This approach relies on the assumption of market efficiency, meaning that market prices accurately❓ reflect available information.
-
- Key Steps in the Sales Comparison Approach:
- Identifying comparable sales❓: Selecting properties that are similar to the subject property in terms of location, physical characteristics, legal rights, and market conditions (refer to Chapter 5 for data collection techniques). Site analysis and building data are essential here.
- Adjustments for Differences: Quantifying and adjusting the sales prices of the comparables to account for differences between the comparables and the subject property. This is the most critical step.
- Reconciliation of Value Indicators: Analyzing the adjusted sales prices of the comparables to arrive at a single❓ indicated value or a narrow range of values for the subject property.
-
- Adjustment Techniques: Quantifying Differences
- Dollar Adjustments: Adjustments are made in absolute dollar amounts to reflect the value of specific differences (e.g., adding \$5,000 for an extra bathroom).
- Percentage Adjustments: Adjustments are made as a percentage of the comparable sales price to reflect the relative value of differences (e.g., reducing the sales price by 5% due to inferior location).
- Paired Sales Analysis: Analyzing sales of similar properties with only one significant difference to isolate the value of that difference.
- Adjustment Grid: All adjustments are recorded in an adjustment grid. Adjustments are always applied to the comparable, not to the subject. Adjustments to the comparable are made as if the comparable was “more like the subject”.
-
- Practical Application and Related Experiments
- Data Collection Exercise: Collect sales data for comparable properties from online databases, real estate agents, and public records.
- Adjustment Matrix Construction: Create an adjustment matrix and apply paired sales analysis to determine appropriate adjustment amounts for different property characteristics.
- Sensitivity Analysis: Vary adjustment amounts within a reasonable range and observe the impact on the final value conclusion. This demonstrates the sensitivity of the approach to individual judgments.
-
- Formulaic Representation and Variable Definitions:
- The Sales Comparison Approach may be summarized by the formula:
Subject Value = Comparable Sales Price +/- Adjustments
-
- Relationship to Course Description:
- This approach directly relates to the course description’s emphasis on site and building analysis. Understanding lot shape, view impact, zoning, etc. informs the selection of comparables and the magnitude of adjustments.
3. The Income Approach: Valuing Properties Based on Their Income-Generating Potential
-
- Theoretical Basis: The Principle of Anticipation and Present Value
- The Income Approach is based on the principle of anticipation. Property value is derived from the present worth of the future income stream it is expected to generate.
- The underlying principle is present value (PV). The present value of a future income stream depends on how much return an investor requires on an investment.
-
- Methodologies within the Income Approach:
- Gross Rent Multiplier (GRM): Simplified method suitable for single-family residential properties. Value is estimated by multiplying gross rental income by a market-derived GRM.
Value = Gross Rental Income * GRM
. - Direct Capitalization: Value is estimated by dividing net operating income (NOI) by a capitalization rate (cap rate).
Value = NOI / Cap Rate
. More appropriate for commercial properties. - Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis: Detailed analysis that projects future cash flows over a specific holding period and discounts them back to present value using a discount rate that reflects the risk of the investment.
-
- Gross Rent Multiplier (GRM): A Simplified Valuation Tool
- The GRM is derived from comparable rental properties by dividing their sale prices by their gross monthly or annual rental income.
- The selection of an appropriate GRM for the subject property requires careful consideration of market conditions, property characteristics, and rental rates.
- GRM = Sale Price / Gross Rental Income
-
-
Cap Rate Determination and NOI Calculation:
Net Operating Income (NOI)
is potential gross income (PGI) less vacancy and collection losses (VC) to arrive at effective gross income (EGI), less operating expenses (OE). NOI is the money remaining that can pay the mortgage, and still provide a return to the investor. NOI = PGI - VC - OE- NOI is a very important indicator to the investor community. Therefore, in the investor community the relationship of income and rate to the value of the investment, is expressed as the IRV formula, where Income = Rate x Value
- The
Capitalization Rate (Cap Rate)
is the rate of return that an investor is willing to accept for a particular property. Cap rate is expressed as a percentage. Cap rates can be derived from market data, band of investment techniques, and various formulaic rates (such as the mortgage-equity formula). It must take into consideration that money is safe, sterile, and lazy. Therefore, money must be put to work for the investor to produce a desirable and competitive rate. That is to say, investments must produce a proper return for the investor, in proportion to the risk involved.
-
-
- Practical Application and Related Experiments
- GRM Calculation: Calculate the GRM for several comparable rental properties and apply it to the subject property.
- Income and Expense Statement Construction: Create a pro forma income and expense statement for a commercial property, estimating potential gross income, vacancy rates, operating expenses, and NOI.
-
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis: Using a financial calculator or spreadsheet software, perform a DCF analysis for a multi-family property, projecting future cash flows and calculating present value.
6. 6. Relationship to Course Description: -
This approach relates to the course description’s emphasis on understanding how property characteristics and market data (rental rates, occupancy rates) influence value.
4. Reconciliation: Forging a Single Value Opinion from Multiple Indicators
-
- The Importance of Reconciliation:
* The process of reconciliation involves analyzing the appraisal problem, selecting the most appropriate method of the three, and giving it the most weight in determining the final estimate of value.
* Reconciliation is the process of analyzing the appraisal problem, selecting the most appropriate method of the three, and giving it the most weight in determining the final estimate of value.
- The Importance of Reconciliation:
-
- Reconciliation Defined: RECONCILIATION is the process of analyzing the appraisal problem, selecting the most appropriate method of the three, and giving it the most weight in determining the final estimate of value.
-
- Considerations During Reconciliation:
- Data Reliability: Assess the quality and reliability of the data used in each approach.
- Approach Applicability: Determine which approach is most applicable❓ to the subject property and the specific appraisal problem.
- Market Relevance: Consider which approach is most reflective of how market participants are valuing similar properties.
- Use of the appraisal. For example, all things being equal, more weight may be placed on the value indicated by the income approach in the case of an appraisal that will be used by an investor who is looking for income property. On the other hand, if the appraisal is being used to help the owner-occupant purchaser qualify for a home loan, the sales comparison data approach may be considered the most reliable.
-
- Practical Application and Related Experiments:
- Case Study Analysis: Analyze case studies where the three approaches yield different value indicators and justify the final value conclusion based on the principles of reconciliation.
- Sensitivity Analysis (Continued): Vary weightings assigned to each approach and observe the impact on the final value conclusion.
Conclusion
This chapter has provided a comprehensive overview of the three approaches to value and the principles of reconciliation. Mastering these techniques is essential for conducting thorough and accurate property appraisals.
Key Terms
* Accrued Depreciation
* Cap Rate
* Gross Rent Multiplier (GRM)
* NOI
* Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)
* Reconciliation
Review Questions
Practice Problems (Examples)
Quiz
This structure, informed by the book and course descriptions, should furnish your students with a deep understanding of value methodologies.
Chapter Summary
- list the three basic activity zones of a house and describe their relationships to each other;
- describe the characteristics that affect functional utility in the various rooms of a house,
- identify the characteristics of various building components that can affect value❓, and
- understand the technical terminology used to describe residential construction.
I. Classification of Houses
Houses are generally classified on the basis of four characteristics: the number of units, whether the building is attached or detached, the number of stories and the architectural style.
The NUMBER OF UNITS refers to the number of separate households that the building is designed to accommodate. Although usage may vary in different areas, the term “house” is most often used to refer to a single❓-FAMILY RESIDENCE. If a building has multiple units that share a common access and other common areas, it is usually referred to as an APARTMENT BUILDING.
A DETACHED HOUSE is one that is not connected to any other property. ATTACHED HOUSES share one or more walls, called “party walls,” that are jointly owned by the two adjoining properties. ROW HOUSES, common in many urban areas, are an example of attached dwellings. Ownership of an attached dwelling often involves a PARTY WALL AGREEMENT, which assigns responsibility for maintenance and repair of the party wall(s) (see Figure 7-1).
A. TYPES OF HOUSES
The “type of house” refers to the number of stories or levels in the house, and their relationship to each other.
Although modern construction methods allow for all sorts of variations, the vast majority of houses fall into five basic “type” categories (see Figure 7-2):
1. one-story,
2. one and one-half story,
3. two-story,
4. split-level, and
5. bi-level (also known as split-entry or raised ranch).
- One-Story House
A ONE-STORY HOUSE, often called a “ranch” or “rambler,” has its entire living area on the ground floor. It may or may not have a BASEMENT, which is a room of full story height located below the first floor, at least partially below ground level, and primarily❓ not used for living accommodations.
The advantages of one-story houses include: ease of exterior maintenance, flexibility of floor plan design and the fact that there are no stairs to climb.
On the down side, this type of house is relatively expensive to build; by comparison, a two-story house with the same exterior dimensions has twice the living area, with essentially no extra cost for roof or foundation. (Roof costs for a one-story house are often minimized by using a low pitched roofline.)
One-story houses also require a greater amount of lot space in relation to the amount of living area, so they may be inappropriate or impractical on small or narrow lots. - One and One-Half Story House
Also known as a Cape Cod, the ONE AND ONE-HALF STORY HOUSE has a steeply pitched roof that permits part of the attic area to be used for living space. Roof dormers, which add to the amount of usable upstairs space, are a common feature of this type of house. As in the case of one-story houses, the foundation may or may not include a basement. Construction costs per square foot tend to be lower for one and one-half story houses than for one-story houses.
One and one-half story houses are often built with expandability in mind. Because the ground floor normally has at least one bedroom (and sometimes two), the upstairs level can be left unfinished until the extra space is needed. However, ease of expandability will depend on the quality of the original design and construction, which should allow for adequate access (stairs), ventilation (windows) and plumbing (bathrooms) on the attic level. - Two-Story House
Compared to a one-story or one and one-half story house, the two-story house is more economical in terms of construction cost per square foot of living space.
The reason for the economy is that square footage can be doubled without doubling foundation and roof system costs. This design also allows for the most living space on a given size of lot. Bedrooms are normally located on the upper floor, providing a natural separation between the public and private areas of the house.
A concern with all multi-level houses is the design and efficiency of heating and cooling systems. Because heat rises, a poorly designed system will make it difficult to keep the lower level warm in winter, and the upstairs cool in the summer.
With a well designed system, however, heating and cooling efficiency may actually be greater than for single-story houses, since the building has less exterior surface area relative to the amount of heated or cooled interior space. - Split-Level House
A SPLIT-LEVEL HOUSE has three or four different levels, which are staggered so that each level is separated from the next by half of a flight of stairs. Bedrooms and baths are located on the top level. Half a flight down are the main entry, living room, dining room and kitchen. Down another half-story, beneath the bedroom level, is space for a family room, den or spare bedroom; the garage is often located on this level as well. A fourth level, equivalent to a basement, may be located below the living/dining/kitchen space.
The design of a split-level home lends itself to a sloped lot, where the garage and main entry can both open out at grade level. On a flat site, the main entry will be raised one- half story above the finished grade.
A split-level house has some of the same benefits as a two-story house in terms of construction, cost efficiency and natural separation of the various functional areas of the home. - Bi-Level House
A BI-LEVEL or SPLIT-ENTRY HOUSE has two main levels, one atop the other, with an entry or foyer located on a level halfway between. The lower level is sunk about halfway below ground, so the entry is even with the grade level. This design is sometimes called a “raised ranch,” since it is essentially a one-story home with a finished basement that has been raised partially out of the ground. The main rooms of the house are all on the upper level, with the lower story used for a family room or rec room, and perhaps a spare bedroom.
Since the lower level of a split-entry house is partly below ground, special care must be taken to provide adequate insulation and moisture proofing. Another drawback to this design is the lack of a basement or crawlspace in which to run pipes and ductwork.
Nevertheless, split-entry homes are cost-effective to build, and the finished lower level space is considered part of the “gross living area” for appraisal purposes in many parts of the country.
II. Architectural Styles
ARCHITECTURAL STYLE is the character of a building’s form and ornamentation.
If homebuyers in a particular area do not find a particular architectural style desirable, homes of that style are likely to sell for less than similar size homes having architectural styles which are more desirable within that community.
Architectural styles have traditionally been influenced by local factors such as climate and the availability of different building materials.
There are many examples of traditional architectural styles that are adapted to a particular location: Spanish style houses with thick adobe walls and tile roofs in the southwest desert, Southern Colonial houses with deep shaded porches in the hot, humid South, or Cape Cod style homes designed for protection from cold northern winds in New England (see Figure 7-3).
Local traditional styles can still be found in many areas, but location is much less of an influence on architectural style than it used to be.
Builders are no longer limited to using local materials, since modern transportation systems make different building materials widely available at reasonable costs. The invention of central heating and cooling, as well as improved insulating materials, has broadened the range of architectural styles that can be adapted to local climates.
A. COMPATIBILITY
COMPATIBILITY means that a building is in harmony with its use or uses and its environment. In terms of value, one type or style of house is not inherently better or worse than any other. What is most important to value is the compatibility of the design. Compatibility has several different aspects. To maximize value, the design of a house should be compatible with the designs of other homes in the area, with the physical and environmental characteristics of the building site, with the materials used in the construction, and with the preferences of the local market.
First of all, the design of a house should be compatible with the styles of other houses in the local neighborhood.
The market may welcome a limited degree of uniqueness in design, but value will generally suffer if the design contrasts too radically with surrounding houses.
Subdivision developers often impose design restrictions on their developments, because they know that compatibility of design will have a positive impact on property values in the subdivision.
Case/Example: A contemporary style house located in a neighborhood of other contemporary style houses is likely to be viewed positively by the market. But the same house located in a neighborhood of traditional style homes might seem “out-of-place,” and its value could suffer as a result.
Compatibility of design also refers to the suitability of the design for the particular building lot and location. Value is enhanced by a design that takes advantage of physical site characteristics, such as views. The design should also be appropriate for the topography of the site. For example, split-level designs often work well on hilly sites, while colonial style houses do not. Finally, the design should be appropriate for the local climate. A design that is specifically adapted to a hot desert climate, for example, would be inappropriate in an area with cool, rainy weather.
A building’s architectural style is often defined at least in part by the materials used in its construction. Spanish style homes have clay tile roofs, Tudor’s utilize timber framing, contemporary designs incorporate large areas of glass. A compatible design is one where the materials are appropriate to the style.
Case/Example: A clay tile roof on a Cape Cod house would look ridiculous to most potential homebuyers.
The final aspect of design compatibility is perhaps the most important: the design must be compatible with the demands of the market.
The popularity of any given design is influenced by the economic and social forces that affect value. As lifestyles and demographics change, so does the demand for different design features in housing.
Ultimately, it is the local market that determines what is a “good” design, and what is a “bad” one.
Case/Example: A development of new contemporary style houses is built in an older community with mostly traditional style housing. If the market places an emphasis on the historic character of the community, the contemporary homes will be viewed as incompatible, and their value will suffer. On the other hand, if market forces are creating a demand for more modern housing in the community, the contemporary homes may not be incompatible at all, but may simply represent a new trend in community standards.
III. Elements of House Design
An appraiser must be able to identify the various elements of house design and evaluate any defects in those elements. The elements of house design include siting, interior functional zones, and room characteristics.
He or she may use mobile apps to reproduce accurate renderings to use for comparison purposes.
A. SITING
SITING refers to the placement of the house on the building lot. Placement is normally limited to some extent by building code set-back requirements, which call for minimum distances between the house and the property’s boundaries. Topographic considerations such as slopes or poor soil conditions may also limit where the house may be placed on the lot. Within these limits, however, careful placement of the house on the lot can have a significant impact on value.
There are four basic considerations in designing the placement of a house on its lot: orientation to the sun, orientation to prevailing storm winds, orientation to views, and the division of the lot into functional zones (see Figure 7-4).
Appraisers can create figures like the one above by using appropriate mobile apps.
Orientation to the sun affects the amount of light and heat that can enter the house. In most areas, a design where the living areas of the house face south is considered optimum. This orientation takes best advantage of natural lighting in the most used areas of the home, and helps maximize solar heat gain in the winter. Excessive summer heat gain can be avoided by using wide roof overhangs, which shade the house in summer when the sun is high in the sky, but allow light and heat to penetrate in the winter when the sun’s path is lower.
Screening with deciduous trees is another effective way to block the summer sun but still allow it to shine through in the winter when the trees are bare.
In some areas, orientation to prevailing storm winds is an important siting consideration. In areas that are subject to frequent or heavy storms from a particular direction, it is best to minimize the amount of window area that is directly exposed to the winds, in order to cut down on heat loss. Entries should also be sheltered from the direct path of the storms.
An attractive view can add significantly to the value of a house. Views should be visible from the most used areas of the house. Even if the site does not have an attractive territorial view, careful landscaping can provide a pleasant view of the lot from the living area.
The last aspect of house siting is the division of the lot into functional areas or zones, the so-called public, private, and service zones. The area that can be viewed from the street frontage is the public zone. Areas shielded from the street by the house, or by fencing or other landscaping, constitute the private area. The service area includes access ways (driveway, walkways, etc.) and outdoor storage areas. Good design maximizes the amount of private area available for household activities.
B. INTERIOR FUNCTIONAL ZONE
An appraiser cannot underestimate the importance of FUNCTIONAL UTILITY, which concerns a building’s ability to perform the function for which it is intended according to current market tastes and standards; as well as the efficiency of use in terms of architectural style, design and layout, traffic patterns, and the size and type of rooms.
A well-designed house should provide space for three basic activities: living, working, and sleeping.
Ideally, the spaces provided for each of these activities should be separated, so that one activity does not interfere with another. For example, bedrooms should be located where they will not be disturbed by activities in the living and working areas of the house.
Figure 7-5 shows how the spaces for the three different activities can be separated into zones. The LIVING ZONE includes the public areas of the house: the living room, dining room, family room and guest bath. The WORKING ZONE is comprised of the kitchen and laundry/ utility room. Bedrooms and private baths are located in the SLEEPING ZONE.
The separate activity areas of the home are connected by hallways, stairs and entry ways, which are sometimes referred to as a fourth zone of the house, the CIRCULATION ZONE. While the three activity zones should be designed to provide separation of the activities, they should also allow for easy circulation between and within zones.
Design features that affect desirability affect value because value is determined by supply and demand features of the marketplace.
A house’s value is affected by the building’s FLOOR PLAN, which is an architectural drawing indicating the exact layout of rooms and illustrating the functional or nonfunctional relationship between them. Structures with wasted space might lack space where it is otherwise desired so that the property will be less desirable to buyers than similar size homes.
How the designer allocates space affects desirability for many buyers. An example is while a custom 3,000 square foot home might have only two bedrooms because that is what the original owner wanted, to most potential buyers, the design would be a negative feature.
Case/Example: In a retirement oriented community, a two-story home without a bedroom on the first level is likely to be far less desirable than one with this feature.
C. ROOM CHARACTERISTICS - Kitchens
The kitchen is commonly the most used room of the house, so its design and location have a large impact on the functionality of the overall floor plan.
Kitchens should be conveniently accessible from both the main entrance and service entrance of the house, and should be located adjacent to the dining room and family room, if these rooms are included in the design. Also, the kitchen should be designed so that it is not necessary to walk through the working area in order to reach other rooms of the house.
A critical aspect of kitchen design is the work triangle, which is formed by the sink, refrigerator, and range. The distances between the three points of the work triangle can make the difference between an efficient kitchen design and a poor one. If the distances are too small, the kitchen will be cramped; if they are too great, preparing a meal will seem like a five-mile hike. A distance of four to seven feet between each point of the work triangle is considered optimal (see Figure 7-6).
Kitchen sizes vary considerably. Eighty square feet of space (8’ x 10’) is considered a minimum, but kitchens twice that size are not uncommon. Larger kitchens often include an eating area or family activity area. The design should include adequate counter and cabinet space, and plenty of electrical outlets for kitchen appliances.
Lighting and ventilation are important considerations in kitchen design. Overhead lights should illuminate all areas of the kitchen, and a vent or fan should be located over the cooking area to allow cooking fumes to escape. Natural lighting is desirable, but the placement of windows can be a problem. The best location for a kitchen window is over the sink. Additional windows are desirable so long as they do not take up space needed for wall cabinets.
Windows should never be placed over the cooking area. - Laundry/Utility Rooms
Laundry areas are best located where they are convenient to the sleeping area of the house, off the bedroom hallway for example. However, location of the laundry area is not as critical as most other rooms of the house, and laundries are often located in the garage or basement.
The laundry area should be well-ventilated, and located where noise from the appliances will not disturb others. - Living Rooms
The living room is the main public room of the house.
It should be located near the main (guest) entry, be separated from the sleeping area, and preferably be on the south side of the house. If the house has a dining room, it should be next to the living room. It should not be necessary to cross through the living room in order to reach the kitchen or bedrooms.
The size and shape of the living room should allow for easy arrangement of furniture. About 200 square feet is the minimum size, and rectangular shaped rooms tend to work best for furniture placement. The modern trend is for smaller living rooms, particularly in homes with a separate family/recreation room. - Family Rooms
In many areas, the FAMILY ROOM (also called a recreation room) has taken over the role of the living room as the main center of entertainment and socializing in the house. As part of the living zone, the family room should be separated from the sleeping zone; however, it is usually considered an advantage if the family room is next to (or near) the kitchen.
Since the family room is a center of activity for household members, direct access to the outside is also an asset. - Dining Rooms
Dining rooms may be formal or informal. A formal dining room or area is a separate room that is designed for that purpose. Informal dining areas are usually attached to or part of the kitchen itself, and may take the form of a nook or alcove.
The main considerations for the dining area are that it should be large enough to accommodate a dining table and chairs (including room to get in and out of the table), and it should have easy access to the kitchen so that food does not have to be carried through other areas of the house. - Bedrooms
The number of bedrooms has a major effect on house value.
Normally, homes with different numbers of bedrooms appeal to different segments of the market, that is, to families of different sizes or lifestyles. The average household size in the market will have a large impact on the desirability of three- or four-bedroom homes, as opposed to two-bedroom homes.
Ideally, bedrooms should all be located in a separate sleeping zone, to provide both privacy and noise insulation. The most common arrangement is to locate the bedrooms on a separate story or wing. Each bedroom should have convenient access to a bathroom, either directly or via a private hallway. Also, it should not be necessary to go through a bedroom to reach another room (other than a private bath).
Depending on the room layout, a size of 9’ x 10’ is the minimum needed to allow for a single bed, 10’ x 12’ for a double bed. Whether larger room sizes will add to value depends on local market preferences. Most homes have at least one bedroom that is larger than the others, the MASTER BEDROOM. Modern master bedrooms will often have walk-in closets and other amenities.
Each bedroom should have its own clos
I am unable to accurately❓ create tables or figures in markdown or text-based responses. I can generate general descriptive text regarding their common utilization.
Residential Construction Scientific Summary
This chapter of “Property Appraisal Essentials: Site and Building Analysis” delves into the intricacies of residential construction, providing a scientific understanding vital for accurate property appraisals. It emphasizes how construction types, architectural styles, design elements, and building materials significantly influence a property’s value, directly addressing the course’s goal of mastering property evaluation techniques and informed appraisal decisions.
The chapter begins by classifying houses based on their characteristics (number of units, attachment, stories, and architectural style), highlighting five basic types: one-story, one-and-a-half-story, two-story, split-level, and bi-level. It emphasizes construction cost efficiency, space utilization, and the importance of understanding potential drawbacks associated with each type, such as the challenges in multi-level homes (heating and cooling efficiency) or space requirements for sprawling one-story designs.
Next, the chapter explores architectural styles, underscoring that value is not inherent to a specific style but depends on compatibility: harmony with the surrounding neighborhood, appropriateness for the site, effective use of building materials, and alignment with local market preferences. This relates directly to the course objective of assessing property characteristics and how they influence value.
A significant portion of the chapter focuses on the elements of house design. These key design elements such as room characteristics (kitchen work triangles, bedroom sizes), building dimensions and the type of utility infrastructure can aid appraisers to identify potential issues in residential construction. In particular, the chapter stresses the importance of interior functional zoning (living, working, and sleeping zones) to ensure that the interior spaces of the home have functional unity and are not disruptive to other spaces within the same unit. It discusses optimizing siting on the lot, considering solar orientation, wind exposure, views, and lot zoning, to increase value.
The chapter provides a detailed review of construction methods and materials that have a major influence on value. Topics include:
• Foundations: Detailed review of different types of materials and techniques used for foundation construction.
• Framing and Sheathing: Examines building structure and related terminologies including framing methods, the type of roofs, and other structural concerns.
• Exterior and Interior Finishes: Thorough discussion of the impact on the final cost of construction based on type of walls, insulation, windows, doors, or the type of finishes of each room.
• Utilities and Energy Efficiency: Detailed analysis of the role of plumbing, HVAC and electrical systems.
Key Scientific Points and Conclusions:
• Residential Construction Terminology: Understanding technical terms related to residential construction is crucial for accurate building descriptions and clear communication in appraisal reports.
• Architectural Harmony: A design’s value is dependent on its compatibility with the neighborhood’s style, the site’s characteristics, construction materials, and market preferences.
• Functional Utility: Internal room functionality contributes significantly to a building’s ability to function according to market norms. Efficient designs balance spatial arrangement, transit patterns, and area sizes.
• Building Materials and their Impact on Value: Material quality and maintenance requirements for structures, facades, and finishes affect long-term value. Modern materials and sustainable construction may increase market value, but may be different depending on regional norms.
• Importance of Energy Efficiency: Energy efficiency and building energy consumption influence home prices, particularly in climates with high-energy costs.
Implications for Property Appraisal:
• Site and building construction assessment: Appraisers must evaluate how the building is located on the construction site, and consider the implications of landscaping, storm water management, drainage and building orientation on home value.
• Comparable selection: The chapter emphasizes that a deep understanding of construction methods and materials enables the appraiser to choose more accurate properties to use as comparable sales❓ within the sales comparison approach to value.
• Functional evaluation: Assessing a property’s plan should consider room characteristics, spatial connections, and total functional utility. The ability to identify design and functional flaws contributes to a reasonable estimate of value and enables precise adjustments for differences between subject properties and comparable properties.
• Property valuation through building materials: In order to correctly estimate prices and perform cost-based examinations, knowledge of construction materials, and techniques is essential. This information is crucial for determining construction costs and depreciation when utilizing the cost method for evaluation.
• Informed judgments: A comprehensive awareness of building construction aids in making defensible judgements while completing evaluations. This guarantees that evaluations are in line with USPAP requirements for competency and reliability.
In summary, this chapter emphasizes how an appraiser must possess a working knowledge of residential construction to produce a dependable and well-supported appraisal report. By thoroughly assessing site qualities, construction techniques, building materials, and architectural characteristics, appraisers can effectively evaluate homes’ value and conform to the essential training requirements set forth in this course.