Applying and Reconciling Sales Comparison Adjustments
The sales comparison approach, a cornerstone of real estate appraisal, relies on the principle of substitution, positing that a rational buyer will pay no more for a property than the cost of acquiring an equally desirable substitute. To implement this approach effectively, appraisers must systematically identify, quantify, and apply adjustments to comparable property sales data to account for differences between the subject property and the comparables. These adjustments are not arbitrary but are derived from market analysis, reflecting the paired data analysis quantifying the contribution of specific property characteristics to overall value. The application of these adjustments is a critical step in synthesizing disparate data points into a credible value indication.
However, the process extends beyond simple arithmetic. After applying individual adjustments, a reconciliation phase is required to address the range of indicated values derived from the various comparable sales. This reconciliation is not a mere averaging of values, but a weighted analysis prioritizing the most reliable comparables and adjustments. Scientific rigor is paramount in this process; the appraiser must demonstrate a clear and logical basis for weighting certain comparables or adjustments over others, based on data quality, market relevance, and the strength of supporting evidence.
The scientific importance of this process lies in its attempt to create a model that closely mimics the actual behavior of market participants. Adjustments and reconciliation are crucial for mitigating biases, providing a more accurate representation of market dynamics, and ensuring the credibility and defensibility of the appraisal.
The educational goals of this chapter are to equip the student with the following competencies:
1. To understand the theoretical basis and practical techniques for applying quantitative and qualitative adjustments to comparable sales data.
2. To critically evaluate the reliability and relevance of different types of data used for making adjustments, particularly extracting market-based adjustments.
3. To develop a systematic and transparent process for reconciling the indicated values from adjusted comparable sales, providing a well-supported final value conclusion.
4. To understand the limitations inherent in the sales comparison approach and to be aware of potential sources of error in the adjustment and reconciliation process.