1
Chapter: Which of the following is a violation of federal antitrust laws? (EN)
Introduction: Which of the following is a violation of federal antitrust laws?
Federal antitrust laws, primarily the Sherman Act, the Clayton Act, and the Federal Trade Commission Act, form the bedrock of competition policy in the United States. These statutes are designed to prevent anti-competitive behavior, thereby safeguarding consumer welfare, promoting economic efficiency, and fostering innovation. Specifically, these laws target agreements in restraint of trade, monopolization, and mergers or acquisitions that substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly.
The scientific importance of understanding antitrust law violations stems from the critical role competition plays in driving market dynamics. Economically sound antitrust enforcement, grounded in rigorous analysis of market structure, firm conduct, and potential effects on consumers, is essential for preventing distortions that lead to higher prices, reduced output, and stifled innovation. Empirical research consistently demonstrates a positive correlation between competitive markets and economic growth, underscoring the necessity of effectively identifying and addressing antitrust violations. Furthermore, behavioral economics has illuminated cognitive biases and strategic interactions that firms may exploit to gain undue market power, enriching the understanding of competitive harms.
This chapter aims to equip learners with the conceptual framework and analytical tools necessary to accurately identify practices that violate federal antitrust laws. This objective requires a nuanced understanding of per se illegal conduct (e.g., price fixing, bid rigging, market allocation) versus conduct subject to the rule of reason analysis, which involves a comprehensive assessment of pro-competitive benefits and anti-competitive harms. The chapter will also address unilateral conduct, such as predatory pricing and exclusive dealing, under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, emphasizing the requisite elements of market power and anti-competitive effect. Finally, the chapter will cover the Clayton Act and its prohibition of mergers and acquisitions that substantially lessen competition, highlighting the role of market definition and concentration measures (e.g., Herfindahl-Hirschman Index) in merger analysis. Upon completion of this chapter, learners will be able to apply economic principles and legal precedents to discern whether a given scenario constitutes a violation of federal antitrust laws, contributing to informed decision-making in legal, business, and policy contexts.
